So, what's wrong with tracing the 19th century antecedents of unit trains if
that's a subject that interests people here and it might go on indefinitely?
The last time I checked this was the Yahoo group of the Canadian Pacific
HISTORICAL Association.
"Who knows" what we might learn here!
Derek Boles
--- In cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Doug Cummings" <dougcummings@...> wrote:
This can go on indefinately. If you want to count a logging train as a unit
train, and it does meet the basic requirements, then you can trace the first
unit train back to sometime in the 19th Century. I think that precedes the
first Silk Train. And who knows there may have been other trains that would
qualify before that.
DEC
