[ciphershed] Re: Plausible deniablility and hidden volumes

  • From: Kyle Marek <psppsn96@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:48:38 -0400

On 06/13/2014 09:36 AM, Bill Cox wrote:
> In this environment, I think the secondary
> hidden volume has value.
I agree with that fully. I don't think the whole multi-hidden volume is
necessary for what it's purpose is, though. I bet some people just want
to use it to hide their porn and have an innocent looking O.S. for
airports.. haha!

In all seriousness, though, I can understand multiple hidden volumes if
you're speaking in the context of protecting your cryptographic currency
or VPN and PGP keys and such if you have reason to hide that from your
friends when you don't need a fully innocent looking O.S.

Do you think a lot of governments are actually going to accuse you of
not showing "all" of your hidden volumes if they know it's a possibility?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by
any government official or worker regarding my participation in
CipherShed or any related project. I have not been asked to supply any
information to them that may be used to impersonate me nor have I been
asked to aid the government or it's officials or workers in modifying
part of CipherShed or any related project. I am not aware of any of my
property or anything regarding me being bugged, searched, or compromised
in any way. Anything that accepts PGP encryption or signing should have
been cryptographically secured with my PGP key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Other related posts: