[ciphershed] Re: Plausible deniablility and hidden volumes

  • From: Kyle Marek <psppsn96@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:04:13 -0400

On 06/13/2014 09:53 AM, PID0 wrote:
> Hidden containers
> have a utility that's perfectly true, but lets not drive ourselves mad
> trying to turn CipherShed into a silver bullet for all the worlds
> privacy woes...
Well to be fair the only thing that even had to do with privacy was the
porn thing and that was a joke, but other than that I agree; There's
little to no use with multiple "hidden" volumes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by
any government official or worker regarding my participation in
CipherShed or any related project. I have not been asked to supply any
information to them that may be used to impersonate me nor have I been
asked to aid the government or it's officials or workers in modifying
part of CipherShed or any related project. I am not aware of any of my
property or anything regarding me being bugged, searched, or compromised
in any way. Anything that accepts PGP encryption or signing should have
been cryptographically secured with my PGP key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Other related posts: