[ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:45:23 -0400
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niklas Lemcke - ???
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:41
>To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses
>
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:30:05 -0400
>"Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>> >bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niklas Lemcke - ???
>> >Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 08:04
>> >To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Subject: [ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses
>> >
>> >On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:57:16 -0400
>> >"Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>> >> >bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pid Zero
>> >> >Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 07:50
>> >> >To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >Subject: [ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses
>> >> >
>> >> >Sounds like a good idea, helps to keep official comms separate.
>> >> >
>> >> >On Friday, June 27, 2014, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬
><niklas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I just added ciphershed.org to my postfix's domains.
>> >> >
>> >> > What do the others think about
>> >> > - @ciphershed.org domains for the PMC and / or QA Team members?
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure; should individual members be easily contactable? I realise
>that
>> >someone could look us up and get our e-mail addresses, but to actually
>post
>> >individual e-mail addresses for us on our website might make it too easy to
>> >isolate single members? I think we want people to contact us all at the
>same
>> >time through the one contact e-mail address.
>> >
>> >The idea is not to put the addresses up publicly, but to have--as Chris
>> >said--a frame for official messaging concerning the ciphershed project.
>> >Otherwise users may see aforget@xxxxxxx post something on the list,
>but
>> >fail to see that it comes from someone on the inside / PMC.
>>
>> Ah, I see. That sounds reasonable. Hm, I'm just concerned that I (and
>others) might accidentally post to the list with their default address (where
>mine is aforget@xxxxxxx), instead of with the @ciphershed.org address.
>Unfortunately, my client isn't smart enough to automatically change my
>sending address depending on who I'm e-mailing...so I don't have a clear
>solution. But yeah, this idea sounds reasonable, so I'll deal with it.
>
>just unsubscribe with your current mail and subscribe with the
>ciphershed mail. Or do it manually if you don't want to rely on my
>server.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
>>
>> >>
>> >> > - an email address for contact, that may or may not forward to either
>> >> > the PMC mailing list or the public mailing list?
>> >>
>> >> We definitely need a general e-mail address for contact, and my initial
>> >thought is that it should probably forward to the PMC mailing list. It's not
>> >necessarily great, since this might muck the mailing list with spam or tech
>> >support requests, but it would give the PMC the chance to either send it
>> >wherever it should go and/or deliberate on how to respond, if it's a more
>> >serious type thing. Will there be a (hopefully) easy way to reply from that
>> >same e-mail address?
>> >
>> >Sure we could send something from that email. I don't know how great an
>> >idea would be to share the login credentials with the whole PMC. I
>> >think us answering from our personal @ciphershed.org domains might
>> >actually be better, but that can be discussed.
>>
>> Yeah, we should discuss this. Responding from our personal
>@ciphershed.org address isn't great, since I think "official" responses need to
>be visible by the whole PMC. But yeah, put it on the agenda.
>
>CC the PMC mailing list on every response and there you go.
But there's no guarantee that the other person will reply all. But yeah,
something to discuss.
Alain
Other related posts:
