[ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses

  • From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:59:10 -0400

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niklas Lemcke - ???
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:53
>To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ciphershed] Re: CipherShed.org mail addresses
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:46:48 -0400
>Stephen R Guglielmo <srguglielmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Remember the PMC mailing list is public archived (as is the regular
>> one). I don't think we should have mail sent to @ciphershed.org to be
>> public. I also don't think we should have individual addresses, just
>> general "team@" and maybe a "qa@" addresses. Someone would have to
>> in charge of it?
>All should be able to read it, and giving access to the same address
>to all members seems like a bad idea. We could forward one address to
>all members of that group, and then have an individual answering and
>again cc-ing the others, i.e. the contact address.

But then, the outside person will then have the one person's e-mail address, 
and might not reply-all to keep the PMC in the loop.


Other related posts: