On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:50:19 +0100 Pid Zero <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sounds like a good idea, helps to keep official comms separate. > > On Friday, June 27, 2014, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬 <niklas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I just added ciphershed.org to my postfix's domains. > > > > What do the others think about > > - @ciphershed.org domains for the PMC and / or QA Team members? > > - an email address for contact, that may or may not forward to either > > the PMC mailing list or the public mailing list? > > > > -- > > Niklas > > > > At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, Niklas > > Lemcke, nor am I under any personal legal compulsion concerning the > > CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my > > assets. > > > > > I was thinking whether we should use aliases or names or full names - similar discussion as we had about the "Authors" site. Since people in the mailing list are usually more techy than visitors to our frontpage, I think aliases would be acceptable. But maybe there are good reasons to stick to (full?) names. What do you think? -- Niklas At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, Niklas Lemcke, nor am I under any personal legal compulsion concerning the CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my assets.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature