<CT> Re: Calmira 3.11... 3.2... 4.0?

  • From: "Martin B. Brilliant" <mbrilliant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: calmira_tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 13:12:55 -0400

On 28 Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:18:23 +0200, Erwin Dokter <edokter@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 3.2 should be fine - the improvements are certainly worth a .1
> increase. 4.0 would be a bit much, IMO....

I agree. Based on the precedent of MS-DOS 4.0, I think 4.0 should be 
reserved for an upgrade that is radical enough to introduce a whole 
new lot of bugs. :-)

Look at the sequence of MS Windows 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 (aka 95, but 
still numbered 4.0... in Control Panel|System). Each introduced a 
major, obvious change in the user interface. On that scale, does the 
new Calmira measure up to an integer increment?

Martin B. Brilliant at home in Holmdel, NJ
To unsubscribe, send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe calmira_tips" in the body. 
OR visit http://freelists.dhs.org

Other related posts: