On pe, 2003-09-19 at 04:26, phrostie wrote: > it's not a new subject, but most discussion about splittig the list has been > off list. > i just got word from the staff at freelists and they do not consider it > duplication as long as the two lists are "really discussing two > different facets of CAD on linux". > > so at the risk of starting a flame war. do we keep cad-linux for user > discussion and anouncements, splitting off the development to a new > list(suggestions for a name)? > > do we create an annoucement list and keep all discussion on cad-linux? That would be nice, if want to know what is happening. And do not like "high-level-discussion". That means too, that members must know how to use it. There should be no reply-to that list. It must be to discussion-list. (For example.) That works in few Linux-User groups. > or > > are there other options that should be considered? > > > btw, i know that most projects have their own development list, but more than > one or two new projects got started on this list. several projects found new > help and ideas from discussion from this list. i'd hate to lose that. > > > i can find strong point for either of the two above options. > feedback, comments, suggestions. My thinking is...That splitting in dev and discussion is ok. Developing is going over my head, but I keep is useful. ;-)