[bookport] Re: Suggestion About List Traffic
- From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:35:09 -0600
The current bookport would only support a stopwatch, the bp is only a usb
client, so anything usb oriented will have to wait for the bookport 2.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tyler Wood
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:11 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion About List Traffic
Actually, I think there should be a few more settings. Settings such as a
stopwatch, if the bookport can handle it, and maybe some more settings such
as, maybe, being able to connect something such as a USB microphone, if
people liked recording, or maybe even, (this is wayyyy in the future), a
USB-connectable braille display. I think this would be neat because if
people just wanted to read and stil wanted or had to listen to something
else (people talking, etc etc), then they could mute speech and use braille,
with out the necesity of needing headphones or speakers.
just my oppinion,
Tyler
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:18 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: Suggestion About List Traffic
>I want a dog hair removal tool!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:57 PM
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bookport] Suggestion About List Traffic
>
>
> I have an idea.
>
> If you have a suggestion about a Book Port feature, even if it is as
> off-the-wall as an automatic dog hair removal tool, please feel free to
> send it to the list. We encourage your creative ideas.
>
> On the other hand, it would be nice if we could avoid getting into too
> much philosaphy about what or what not the Book Port should be.
>
> In other words, if person a says the Book Port should iron clothes, it
> would really help list traffic if person b did not say, "Book Port is
> not a clothes ironer." It is not that everyone on the list is not
> interested in person b's opinion, it is just that many of the people on
> this list are busy, and they do not have time to read the amount of
> traffic generated by these kinds of messages. The traffic is getting so
> bad, in fact, that the developers cannot possibly keep up with the
> traffic and continue to develop clothes ironers and other features that
> many of you on the list have suggested.
>
> If person b feels compelled to write about the fact that Book Port is
> not a clothes ironer, and person b cannot refrain from expressing his
> opinion about this fundimental issue, person b may wish to consider
> writing person a a private, polite message explaining why the device is
> this or that and not the other.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/173 - Release Date: 16/11/2005
>
>
Other related posts:
