I am always bothered when any candidate moves in to a district and
immediately runs for office. It has always bothered me that Congressional
candidates at least in California don't have to live in the districts where
they run. It has also bothered me that in California local elections are
nonpartisan. There are some instances where I like labels the two that come
to mind are party affiliation and GMO labeling.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2016 8:40 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Actually, I don't see it as a big issue. But then, labels aren't especially
important to me. But I must admit that as a life long New York resident, it
bothered me when Hillary Clinton moved to New York and immediately ran for
the Senate, representing New York. My feeling was that she was representing
herself, not New York. She had absolutely no roots in New York. But Sanders
is much more like the kind of Democrat that I grew up thinking that
Democrats are, than Clinton. From what I read in the book about him, he was
politically to the left of the Democratic Party for most of his life. It's
obvious though, that if he were going to have an impact on the election,
he'd have to be a member of a major party. It's also obvious that the
Democratic Party, from the start, believed that his run would be short lived
and since he'd been caucusing with them anyway, there was no reason to bar
him.
Miriam
________________________________
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Krugman
(Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 11:04 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
The issue is that technically Sanders does not claim to be a Democrat. He is
registered as an "independent" Senator although he caucuses with the
democrats. I feel let down by the Democratic party because it has allowed
Sanders to take over as an independent and as a long standing party member I
strongly believe that does make a difference. This is why I say that I feel
let down by the Democratic party as this undermines party membership and
loyalty. For those of you who are members of third parties would you be
satisfied if an outsider someone who might be an ally on some issues is
given carte blanch opportunities to run without actually being a party
member? I believe that it is rationale like this that causes us to get stuck
with "top Two" primaries like we now have shoved down our throats in
California.
Chuck
Chuck
From: Alice Dampman Humel <mailto:alicedh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 4:45 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard
Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Chuck,
I seem to be missing messages, so I only saw yours now below Frank's reply.
I copy from your message:
"I feel that as a loyal longstanding Democrat I have been let down by the
democratic party when they gave him a carte blanche pass to run and say
whatever he wants. While I sympathize with people who are struggling
economically I don't think that Bernie Sanders is the answer"
You feel let down by the Democratic Party because they allowed a candidate
to speak his outh without muzzling him or otherwise dictating what he is
allowed to say, restricting what he can declare his platform to be? I don't
understand that.
If Sanders does not provide the possibility of an answer to the things he
has outlined as big problems, in his candidacy, where do you think any other
possibility lies?
And, another question, if he is indeed still technically an independent in
Vermont, so what? And I do believe he is the Democratic senator from
Vermont, but you may be aware of some technical detail that I"ve missed.
Alice
On Mar 29, 2016, at 4:51 PM, Frank Ventura <frank.ventura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Chuck, while my heart wants to disagree with you my head reluctantly
acknowledges that you probably are correct.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Krugman
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 5:29 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Well Frank, this is how I've always felt about Bernie and Jill.
While Sanders has caucused with the democrats in the Senate he is still
technically registered as an independent in Vermont as I understand it. I
feel that as a loyal longstanding Democrat I have been let down by the
democratic party when they gave him a carte blanche pass to run and say
whatever he wants. While I sympathize with people who are struggling
economically I don't think that Bernie Sanders is the answer.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Ventura
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:08 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Chuck, while I did vote for Sanders in the primary, I am already
regretting it. Sadly, Sanders is starting to sound more and more like Jill
Stein; that is someone who merely wants to derail the democratic party and
put a Republican in the oval office out of some sort of protest. The sad
truth is that after Stein and Sanders get their jollies with their protest
against the mainstream Democratic party they will go back to their comfy
suburban homes and sit back with a glass of wine; while the rest of us
working class suffer the onslaught of President Trump or President Cruz and
all the horrors for our nation that it has brought. So a year from now when
President Trump's death squads are roaming the streets killing the working
class Bernie and Jill will be sitting back watching it all on Foxnews while
their private security forces guard their nicely manicured lawns.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles
Krugman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 2:00 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Miriam, in 2008 you voted for a typical Chicago politician. Spending
time in Chicago growing up in the sixties I found the political machine in
power fascinating. My problem is that I just don't like or agree with Bernie
Sanders and don't believe he is electable nor does he possess the image of
an American president. While There are lots of things I didn't like about
the Clinton Administration and I believe that Hillary was an active
participant in the decisionmaking process and since I don't support the
extreme principles of third parties I feel that in this election I'm voting
for the lesser of the evils. I guess that there is still part of me that
buys in to the capitalistic mentality.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 11:43 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
I live in New York which, probably, will continue to be a blue
state.
However, whatever kind of state it is, my vote, if Bernie isn't the
Democratic candidate, will go to Jill Stein. It won't go to Trump and it
won't go to the Clinton machine. In 2008, I thought I was voting for a
Democratic candidate who represented the values in which I believed. I knew
that he was a bit to the right in terms of Afghanistan, but I tought he was
a Liberal Democrat who believed in the rule of law, in open government. I
discovered that I'd voted for an opportunist, an elitist, for a President
who would ignore the constitution whenever it got in the way of his
appeasement of the security state, of a President who was ready to cut
social security benefits, and who made unacceptable bargains with
Republicans before it was necessary to do so. And he is the more
Ppogressive of the two. If I vote for Hillary, I'd be voting for someone
whose Neo Liberal policies are more warlike, who is even more comfortable
with the elites, who will increase the US appeasement of Israel, whose
concern about African Americans is pure fiction, and who uses her femaleness
as a means to gain support from femininsts. I can't, in good consciience do
it. No, I don't want Trump as President. But the fact that Clinton uses
whatever words , she thinks, will get votes from the Democratic base,
doesn't reassure me. I listened to Robert Sheer's discussion with Thomas
Frank this morning on an audio clip on Truthdig. Are you aware that Bill
Clinton was about to privatize social security? What stopped him? The Monica
Lewinsky scandal. These Democrats, aside from social issues, LGBT rights,
abortion rights, are not anymore the party of the working people.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles
Krugman (Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 2:07 PM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
whether we might like it or not any vote that doesn't go to Hillary
including those on principle to minor candidates could very strongly result
in the trump presidency that no thinking person wants.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Miriam Vieni
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:21 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
Well, voting for Clinton means voting for more of what we have now
which means more wealth going to the 1%, more power for trans national
corporations, larger even less regulated banks, and an escalation of war.
Voting for trump may very well mean and out and out war at home on
minorities along with what I outlined above. One can't tell what Trump will
actdually do in terms of international policy because his statements are
contradictory. I caught a short interview with the author of a biography of
Trump on NPR last night. Briefly, he said Trump never reads books, does not
focus on one subject when you talk with him, but thinks just the way he
sounds in his speeches, and his basically and ego maniac, although he didn't
use that term. I can't visualize myself voting for Hillary because I can't
think of any positives in her favor. But certainly, the prospect of a Trump
Presidency is unthinkable.
Miriam
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl
Jarvis
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:27 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses
Hard Questions For Sanders Campaign and His Youthful Supporters
As the World turns...so turn firm resolves.
Of course it's early yet, but winning the primary appears to be
slipping from the old, experienced hands of Senator Bernie Sanders.
To date I have held to my resolve to vote for Sanders, and then if
he does not win the Party nomination, to vote for Jill Stein, of the Green
Party.
But that was before the Republicans trotted out their Party's Best,
the Clown Crew.
And, as we all guffawed and chuckled over their noisy sideshow, an
awful thing happened. One of the clowns began to look like something out of
the 1940's. A full blown Fascist!
Ranting and raving and telling one big lie after another, Donald
Trump rose like the Phoenix, out of the ashes of the Third Reich.
Despite the Republican Party's denial that he has the popular Party
support, Trump stomps about, stirring up the rank and file, and winning in
state after state.
We now are upon the brink of National disaster. One direction leads
to a Fascist State, and the other leads to a Corporate State. And we have
only ourselves to blame.
If the choice comes down to Clinton or Trump, or even Clinton or
Cruz, we will need to decide if we hold to our original plan to support
Stein, or to "throw away" our vote in an effort to block the takeover of our
emerging Corporate State by the Fascist State. What a choice!
Just a fair warning that I am not ruling out a vote for Hillary
Clinton.
Carl Jarvis
On 3/16/16, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org) Home > Trump
and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His
Youthful Supporters ________________________________________
Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For
Sanders
Campaign and His Youthful Supporters By Steven Rosenfeld [1]
/
AlterNet [2] March 15, 2016 Bernie Sanders' historic and
expectation-surpassing bid for the Democratic presidential
nomination
ran into hard reality in several pivotal primary contests
Tuesday,
where he could not break Hillary Clinton's hold on voters in
several
critical battleground states needed to win in the
fall-notably Ohio
and Florida.
While Sanders supporters will point to his narrow victory in
Missouri,
and overwhelming support among independents who voted in the
Democratic primary, Clinton's victories in those fall
battleground
states-as well as South Carolina and Illinois-means that it
is
virtually impossible for Sanders to win the delegates needed
[3] for
the party's nomination. That fact undoubtedly will take days
to seep
into his remarkable grassroots campaign, where it remains to
be seen
how Sanders will continue his quest or align himself with
Clinton-who
he's criticized for some stances but praised as a person of
integrity.
The backdrop for that as-yet unknown calculation is the
deeply
disconcerting continuing rise of Donald Trump toward the
Republican
nomination, who has continued to amass a delegate
lead-winning in
Florida, Illinois, South Carolina and Missouri. Although
Ohio Gov.
John Kasich beat Trump in his home state, his first victory
on 2016,
his chances-based on the GOP's delegate nomination math-are
an even
longer shot than Sanders catching up with Clinton and
wresting the
nomination. Under the current Republican National Committee
rules, a
candidate needs to have won at least eight states to have
their name
placed in nomination for the presidency. That renders
Kasich's pledge
to supporters that he will win this fall as little more than
campaign
magical thinking.
"Only one campaign has beaten Donald Trump over and over and
over again,"
said Sen. Ted Cruz, also striking a defiant tone despite
losing in
every state Tuesday, including by several thousand votes in
Missouri
to
Trump.
Cruz recited his pledge to recast the federal government and
judiciary
in the most ideological right-wing mold possible, go after
enemies
abroad, and said he was the only alternative to Trump.
"Starting
tomorrow morning, there is a clear choice," Cruz said,
posturing
before supporters in Texas.
Trump's victory in Florida prompted Marco Rubio to suspend
his
campaign, telling his backers that it was not in "God's
plans" for him
to win "in
2016
or maybe ever." He also implored Republicans to reject the
hateful
politics pedaled by Trump, saying, "I ask the American
people, 'Do not
give into the fear. Do not give into the frustration.'"
Tuesday's top two storylines-Trump's rise and Clinton
all-but ending
Sanders' chances of winning sufficient delegates to be the
nominee-came together in her remarks, where she underscored
that she
had won fair and square but tried to reach out to Sanders'
team. "Our
campaign has won more votes than any other campaign-Democrat
or
Republican," began Clinton, in remarks from Palm Beach, "and
I want to
congratulate Sen. Sanders for the vigorous campaign he has
waged."
Clinton said she needed the support of Democrats across the
country,
and then focused on Trump but cited many issues raised by
Sanders.
"Tonight, it is clearer than ever that this may be one of
the most
consequential campaigns of our lifetimes," she said. "The
next
president will walk into the oval office next year in
January, and sit
down at that desk, and start making decisions that will
affect the
lives and the livelihoods of everyone in this country and
indeed,
everyone on this planet."
Clinton said the next president has three major challenges:
making
positive differences in people's lives, keeping America safe
and
bringing the country together. The first example she gave
was a direct
nod to Sanders and his popularity with voters under age 35.
"Young
people across America struggling under the weight of student
debt find
it difficult to imagine the futures they want," she said,
"and they
deserve a president who will relieve them of that burden and
help
future generations go to college without borrowing a dime."
Clinton
continued with another issue that he raised first. "And you
know
grandparents who worry about retirement deserve a president
who will
protect and then expand Social Security for those who need
it most-not
cut or privatize it."
Her to-do list continued: affordable child care; paid family
leave;
equal pay for equal work for women; good jobs with rising
incomes-in
construction, manufacturing, small business and renewable
energy;
standing up for workers and the middle class-"not China, not
Wall
Street and not overpaid corporate executives." She said that
she knows
how to make these promises become realities, and then
slammed Trump,
especially his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stances, and
his embrace
of torture and threatening adversaries.
"That doesn't make him strong, it makes him wrong," she
said.
"We have to take on all forms of inequality and
discrimination,"
Clinton said. "Together, we have to defend all of our
rights-civil
rights and voting rights; worker's rights and women's
rights; LGBT
rights and rights for people with disabilities. And that
starts with
standing with President Obama when he nominates a justice to
the
Supreme Court."
Whether or not Sanders' supporters will buy Clinton's words
and see
how much he has sharpened her embrace and articulation of a
progressive agenda remains to be seen. There is no doubt
that the
short-term messaging from the Sanders' campaign will be that
they will
keep plowing ahead and fight for delegates in the remaining
states. As
of Tuesday, half the states have voted. The math has Clinton
with 300
more [3] pledged delegates than Sanders. That is not
counting
super-delegates, the elected officers and party officials,
where she
has 427 to his 26 [3]. Sanders reportedly spent
$12 million in ads for Tuesday's contests, compared to
Clinton's $7
million.
Many of Sanders' supporters have not been involved in
political
campaigns before, and will have a hard time immediately
processing
Tuesday's results.
But there are some big unanswered questions about what is
next for
them in 2016-and what Clinton will also do to bring these
two
campaigns
together.
Sanders has taken positions that appeal to the disaffected
voters who
have been drawn in by Trump and Cruz. One can only hope that
the
Democratic Party knows it will need the millions of young
economic
progressives to turn out in November. And they may not
unless they
have a candidate they can believe in.
Steven Rosenfeld covers national political issues for
AlterNet,
including America's retirement crisis, democracy and voting
rights,
and campaigns and elections. He is the author of "Count My
Vote: A
Citizen's Guide to Voting"
(AlterNet Books, 2008).
Share on Facebook Share
Share on Twitter Tweet
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'.
[4]
[5]
________________________________________
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-and-clintons-big-night-pos
es-har d-questions-sanders-campaign-and-his-youthful
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-rosenfeld
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-
and-re
sults.html?action=click&contentCollection=Election%202016&regi
on=Foo
ter&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext
&m oduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia
[4] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Trump
and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His
Youthful Supporters [5] http://www.alternet.org/ [6]
http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org) Home > Trump
and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His
Youthful Supporters
Trump and Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For
Sanders
Campaign and His Youthful Supporters By Steven Rosenfeld [1]
/
AlterNet [2] March 15, 2016 Bernie Sanders' historic and
expectation-surpassing bid for the Democratic presidential
nomination
ran into hard reality in several pivotal primary contests
Tuesday,
where he could not break Hillary Clinton's hold on voters in
several
critical battleground states needed to win in the
fall-notably Ohio
and Florida.
While Sanders supporters will point to his narrow victory in
Missouri,
and overwhelming support among independents who voted in the
Democratic primary, Clinton's victories in those fall
battleground
states-as well as South Carolina and Illinois-means that it
is
virtually impossible for Sanders to win the delegates needed
[3] for
the party's nomination. That fact undoubtedly will take days
to seep
into his remarkable grassroots campaign, where it remains to
be seen
how Sanders will continue his quest or align himself with
Clinton-who
he's criticized for some stances but praised as a person of
integrity.
The backdrop for that as-yet unknown calculation is the
deeply
disconcerting continuing rise of Donald Trump toward the
Republican
nomination, who has continued to amass a delegate
lead-winning in
Florida, Illinois, South Carolina and Missouri. Although
Ohio Gov.
John Kasich beat Trump in his home state, his first victory
on 2016,
his chances-based on the GOP's delegate nomination math-are
an even
longer shot than Sanders catching up with Clinton and
wresting the
nomination. Under the current Republican National Committee
rules, a
candidate needs to have won at least eight states to have
their name
placed in nomination for the presidency. That renders
Kasich's pledge
to supporters that he will win this fall as little more than
campaign
magical thinking.
"Only one campaign has beaten Donald Trump over and over and
over again,"
said Sen. Ted Cruz, also striking a defiant tone despite
losing in
every state Tuesday, including by several thousand votes in
Missouri
to
Trump.
Cruz recited his pledge to recast the federal government and
judiciary
in the most ideological right-wing mold possible, go after
enemies
abroad, and said he was the only alternative to Trump.
"Starting
tomorrow morning, there is a clear choice," Cruz said,
posturing
before supporters in Texas.
Trump's victory in Florida prompted Marco Rubio to suspend
his
campaign, telling his backers that it was not in "God's
plans" for him
to win "in
2016
or maybe ever." He also implored Republicans to reject the
hateful
politics pedaled by Trump, saying, "I ask the American
people, 'Do not
give into the fear. Do not give into the frustration.'"
Tuesday's top two storylines-Trump's rise and Clinton
all-but ending
Sanders' chances of winning sufficient delegates to be the
nominee-came together in her remarks, where she underscored
that she
had won fair and square but tried to reach out to Sanders'
team. "Our
campaign has won more votes than any other campaign-Democrat
or
Republican," began Clinton, in remarks from Palm Beach, "and
I want to
congratulate Sen. Sanders for the vigorous campaign he has
waged."
Clinton said she needed the support of Democrats across the
country,
and then focused on Trump but cited many issues raised by
Sanders.
"Tonight, it is clearer than ever that this may be one of
the most
consequential campaigns of our lifetimes," she said. "The
next
president will walk into the oval office next year in
January, and sit
down at that desk, and start making decisions that will
affect the
lives and the livelihoods of everyone in this country and
indeed,
everyone on this planet."
Clinton said the next president has three major challenges:
making
positive differences in people's lives, keeping America safe
and
bringing the country together. The first example she gave
was a direct
nod to Sanders and his popularity with voters under age 35.
"Young
people across America struggling under the weight of student
debt find
it difficult to imagine the futures they want," she said,
"and they
deserve a president who will relieve them of that burden and
help
future generations go to college without borrowing a dime."
Clinton
continued with another issue that he raised first. "And you
know
grandparents who worry about retirement deserve a president
who will
protect and then expand Social Security for those who need
it most-not
cut or privatize it."
Her to-do list continued: affordable child care; paid family
leave;
equal pay for equal work for women; good jobs with rising
incomes-in
construction, manufacturing, small business and renewable
energy;
standing up for workers and the middle class-"not China, not
Wall
Street and not overpaid corporate executives." She said that
she knows
how to make these promises become realities, and then
slammed Trump,
especially his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stances, and
his embrace
of torture and threatening adversaries.
"That doesn't make him strong, it makes him wrong," she
said.
"We have to take on all forms of inequality and
discrimination,"
Clinton said. "Together, we have to defend all of our
rights-civil
rights and voting rights; worker's rights and women's
rights; LGBT
rights and rights for people with disabilities. And that
starts with
standing with President Obama when he nominates a justice to
the
Supreme Court."
Whether or not Sanders' supporters will buy Clinton's words
and see
how much he has sharpened her embrace and articulation of a
progressive agenda remains to be seen. There is no doubt
that the
short-term messaging from the Sanders' campaign will be that
they will
keep plowing ahead and fight for delegates in the remaining
states. As
of Tuesday, half the states have voted. The math has Clinton
with 300
more [3] pledged delegates than Sanders. That is not
counting
super-delegates, the elected officers and party officials,
where she
has 427 to his 26 [3]. Sanders reportedly spent
$12 million in ads for Tuesday's contests, compared to
Clinton's $7
million.
Many of Sanders' supporters have not been involved in
political
campaigns before, and will have a hard time immediately
processing
Tuesday's results.
But there are some big unanswered questions about what is
next for
them in 2016-and what Clinton will also do to bring these
two
campaigns
together.
Sanders has taken positions that appeal to the disaffected
voters who
have been drawn in by Trump and Cruz. One can only hope that
the
Democratic Party knows it will need the millions of young
economic
progressives to turn out in November. And they may not
unless they
have a candidate they can believe in.
Steven Rosenfeld covers national political issues for
AlterNet,
including America's retirement crisis, democracy and voting
rights,
and campaigns and elections. He is the author of "Count My
Vote: A
Citizen's Guide to Voting"
(AlterNet Books, 2008).
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
Report typos and corrections to 'corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx'.
[4] Error!
Hyperlink reference not valid.[5]
Source URL:
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-and-clintons-big-night-pos
es-har d-questions-sanders-campaign-and-his-youthful
Links:
[1] http://www.alternet.org/authors/steven-rosenfeld
[2] http://alternet.org
[3]
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-
and-re
sults.html?action=click&contentCollection=Election%202016&regi
on=Foo
ter&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext
&m oduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia
[4] mailto:corrections@xxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=Typo on Trump
and
Clinton's Big Night Poses Hard Questions For Sanders
Campaign and His
Youthful Supporters [5] http://www.alternet.org/ [6]
http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B
