You could be right. My theory is that the tweet, if it was anti-semitic, and
it may have been anti-Israel rather than anti-semitic, was there to satisfy
his followers, rather than expressing his own ideas. The point of the tweet
was that Hillary was taking money from Jewish donors, I assume, and that
this money influences her positions. Well, in fact, that's what everyone
else has said about her, including Sanders. She and Bill have been
influenced by the money they've gotten from donors. In this case, Haim Sabin
who, along with Adelson, supports Israel unconditionally.
Miriam
________________________________
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alice Dampman
Humel
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 11:46 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Clinton's Transition Team: A Corporate
Presidency Foretold
Just because Trump's son in law is an Orthodox Jew and his daughter
converted doesn't mean that Trump is not an anti-Semite. How many times do
we see it that a racist will accept his son's black wife, but still retains
his prejudices and bigotry about other black people, a homophobe will accept
her daughter's girlfriend but otherwise remain a homophobe.
People often circle the wagons when it comes to their own children or other
family members, but it does not change their bigotry, it makes an exception
for their own, and it's the exception that proves the rule.
I knew a woman, old, elder, whatever you want to call it, who was as white
bread as they come, and when one of her children or grandchildren, I forget
which married an African American, the woman could never speak about him
without adding, "He's the nicest person you'd ever want to meet."
Now what does that tell you, that she had to inform you that this black man
was a nice person? Would she have done the same for a white guy? She never
added that phrase when talking about the spouses of her other progeny...
And, anyway, there's something extra creepy about Donald's interactions with
Ivanka...On Aug 23, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Miriam Vieni
<miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob,
In response to your last point, I think that people of color voted
for
Clinton because they were misinformed by the mass media and by their
own
leaders who are bought off by the Democratic Party establishment.
How many
of them, for example, know that the board of the Congressional Black
Caucus
is made up largely of CEO's of corporations, not black congressional
representatives? Remember that when Obama first started campaigning
for the
Presidency, all of the black establishment leaders were supporting
Hillary.
People are not given facts. Remember Trump's supposedly anti semitic
tweet?
How many people know that he has an Orthodox Jewish son-in-law and
that his
daughter, so active in his campaign, converted to Judaism when she
married?
My point is that everything that is said and done in campaigns is
for public
consumption and is completely unrelated to reality.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob
Hachey
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 11:51 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Clinton's Transition Team: A
Corporate
Presidency Foretold
Hi Charlie,
Firstly, glad you got to have that good experience in Colorado. I
recently
attended the wedding of my sinster-in-law to a great guy and it was
wonderful.
Secondly, I agree completely with you that a President Trump is
unthinkable.
But I cant bring myself to say that Clinton is good, just a good bit
less
bad.
Frankly, I believe that, in many ways, we have been regressing as a
society
since the election of Ronald Reagan and some of that regression has
taken
place under Clinton and even under Obama.
IT sickens me to the core to see corporatist Democrats like the
Clintons and
John Kerry continually coddling our wealthiest citizens. Yes, they
sometimes
talk a good game, but when the rubber meets the road, they always
seem to
not go far enough.
It is surely not all their fault as the Republicans seem to be
better at
negative campaigning and boy am I disgusted by how well negative
campaigning
seems to work in this so-called civilized society.
Bottom line here. What does it say about our society when Hillary
Clinton
seems to be the best we can do?
One more point here. How do we explain the fact that members of
minority
populations chose Clinton over Sanders by a rather wide margin?
Frankly, I
believe that they were not voting in favor of their best econbomic
interests.
Bob Hachey
