[bksvol-discuss] the adult content issue and check boxes

  • From: "Jamie Prater" <jdprater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:47:47 -0500

Hi, all, I admit I've not read all the posts about the VAT's adult content 
proposal.  I do however applaud and have been wanting distinctions similar to 
NLS where we are told in the annotation whether a title has strong language, 
violence, sex, and if it is some, the occurrences may be fewer than if it just 
says descriptions of or strong language, and I like the fact that if the sex 
descriptions are explicit we know about it.  As someone who has typed medical 
reports for 11 years, I've had occasion to search out something that internet 
filters might not let me have, so I've not had occasion to use them, and I'm 
not a total prude on things, but I have had the question when reading book 
synopses on romances if they are just light romance, a heavier romance, mild 
descriptions of sex, explicit descriptions of sex like what is in the NLS 
library or erotic romance or other erotic material.  Could we create a separate 
category for erotic romance or could there be a check box somewhere so those of 
us who may not want to read this could have a heads up, and if that is what 
someone is looking for, they will know right away what to read.  Parents would 
also know what not to let their teen or child read.  I'm not for censorship or 
anything like that as long as someone doesn't attempt to force any genre of 
books upon other people or slam certain genres when they do not fit the bill 
for their reading tastes.  There's plenty of room on this earth for all types 
of books and all types of readers, but adult materials do not belong in the 
wrong hands of children and/or others not mature enough to handle questionable 
content.  I hope this helps bookshare staff and the VAT come to a helpful 
conclusion in this matter so that we can protect children and not cause 
controversy.  Thanks and have a blessed day.  

Other related posts: