Robert and Elizabeth, Thanks, Robert. I took it, and I see Elizabeth is right and it is one of Pamela's, so if it's as bad as you see--even not as bad--smile--I will reject it. I also checked and found that some of the others I had before that are still on page one are also hers--I hadn't opened them before--just had taken them because people were having trouble with them. If those are as bad as one expects--even her friend, I see, had it and released it long ago--I'll reject those, too. I thought we weren't supposed to mention individuals' names, though. smile Although for newbies' info I guess it's o.k. this once. Cindy --- robert tweedy <rtweedy2@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I released it so Cindy it is there if no else wants > it. I can't get it in > paper back so can't rescan it myself. > For skype contact bobwichitaks > For msn contact info rt5117@xxxxxxx no emails. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "robert tweedy" <rtweedy2@xxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 4:13 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: THE DRAGON LORD'S > DAUGHTERS > > > > It will be rejected, going through the book, > lousy. > > For skype contact bobwichitaks > > For msn contact info rt5117@xxxxxxx no emails. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 11:55 AM > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: THE DRAGON LORD'S > DAUGHTERS > > > > > > Reject. This submitter has been asked time and > time again to be aware > > enough when doing scans to press down on the book > in question. Step 1 is > > cluttered with poorly scanned submits from her, > mostly romances, often in > > txt format with no page breaks. Please reject > rather than taking hours > > and > > hours of your valuable time fixing up a scan which > never should have been > > submitted in such poor shape. Please let's stop > rewarding submitters for > > poorly created scans. > > > > E. > > At 12:47 PM 9/16/2006, you wrote: > > > >>It looks like it wasn't pressed down hard enough. > >>Copyright � 2004 by Bertrice Small > >> > >>All rights reserved. > >> > >>Published in 2004 by arrangement with Kensington > Books, an imprint of > >>Kensington Publishing Corp. > >> > >>Thorndike Press� Large Print Romance. > >> > >> > >>The tree indicium is a trademark of Thorndike > Press. > >> > >> > >>The text of this Large Print edition is > unabridged. > >> > >>Other aspects of the book may vary from the > original edition. > >> > >> > >>Set in 16 pt. Plantin by Elena Picard. > >> > >> > >>Printed in the United States on permanent paper. > >> > >> > >>Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data > >> > >>Small, Bertrice. > >> > >>The dragon lord's daughters / Bertrice Small. > >> > >>p. cm. > >> > >>ISBN 0-7862-6523-X (lg. print : he : alk. paper) > 1. Great Britain -- > >>History -- To 1066 -- Fiction. > >> > >>2. Nobility -- Fiction. 3. Sisters -- Fiction. 4. > Britons -- Fiction. 5. > >>Large type books. I. Title. PS3569.M28D73 2004 > >> > >>813 ". 54--dc22 2004041276 Here's the copyright > info from the title > >>page.For skype contact bobwichitaks > >>For msn contact info rt5117@xxxxxxx no emails. > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- From: "E." > <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:33 AM > >>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: THE DRAGON LORD'S > DAUGHTERS > >> > >> > >>>Is this a book which has words cut off in a > pattern which seems t > >>>indicate the book was not pressed down hard > enough and was cut off at the > >>>binding? Is this Pamela Borst's submission? > >>> > >>>E. > >>>At 11:31 AM 9/16/2006, you wrote: > >>> > >>>>Bertrice Small's book has a lot of spaces like > in fa ther for father and > >>>>some of the words have been cut off even though > you know what they are > >>>>but it would take too long to go through 500 > pages, if someone wants > >>>>this one, I can release it or reject it. I know > there are a lot of us on > >>>>this list that like her. Just the spaces and the > choped off words are > >>>>the only problem with this one. > >>>>For skype contact bobwichitaks > >>>>For msn contact info > <mailto:rt5117@xxxxxxx>rt5117@xxxxxxx no emails. > >>> > >>>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > >>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list > >>>of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > >>> > >> > >>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > >>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list > >>of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list > > of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email > to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the > subject line. To get a list > > of available commands, put the word 'help' by > itself in the subject line. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject > line. To get a list of available commands, put the > word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.