[bksvol-discuss] Re: Pamela Bortz

  • From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:06:30 -0400

I too have no qualms if they cannot be fixed. I am suggesting something quite different fromPamela editing her scans in any way. I am suggesting she use, for instance, the paperback settings just posted to this list. Then her books would validate more easily. I reject any with cut off lines. She has improved in this area. I think perhaps Louise or someone can set her up with a technique which will make the kinds of books she scans come out better.

E.
At 10:39 PM 7/2/2006, you wrote:


E,

She knows this.  I recall seeing a message last year posted by her good
friend Louise saying that when they talked, this submitter said she did not
have time to proof her scans.  And louise said that if the submitter was
ever mentioned by name again, she, Louise was "outta here".  And since Cindy
has sent several forwards from her to the list, she must not be on it
anymore.  Since the submitter does know, I, for one, have no qualms
regarding rejecting these poorly scanned books if I see they cannot be fixed
without rescanning.

Sue S.

----- Original Message -----
From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 9:08 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Pamela Bortz


Actually I had to do quite a lot of work with Kurzweil to bring her poorly rated book to excellent. The space and hypen in words and some improved scanning settings could mean her books could become easy validations instead of rejections and books requiring much work for a validator to fix up.

Perhaps pride in her work will help.

Improvement does seem to be occurring though, as I said, her settings need
tweaking.

E.
At 10:03 PM 7/2/2006, you wrote:

>I think I know the person, and I don't think she's on
>this list, but I forwarded your message to her. You're
>right, and I added my comment. I think I recently
>validated something of hers that had very few
>scannos--just needed page breaks or some such thing.
>
>Cindy
>
>--- "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Someone on this list has contact with her, I
> > believe.  Please let her know
> > that her pressing down books is making her scans
> > come out without lines
> > being broken off more often these days.  She still
> > needs to adjust settings
> > to prevent hypen space combinations appearing in
> > words.
> >
> > Perhaps she can use the paperback settings message
> > we just read as a guide.
> >
> > By the way, it would be good to put those paperback
> > scanning settings into
> > our hints section.  Nice work.
> >
> > E.
> >
> >  To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject
> > line.  To get a list of available commands, put the
> > word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
> >
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>  To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
>of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: