[bksvol-discuss] Re: Illusion by Paula Volsky
- From: "Lisa Gorden-Cushman" <crysania@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:45:58 -0700
Thanks Allison
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Allison Hilliker
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:37 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Illusion by Paula Volsky
Hi,
Since the version currently in the collection is rated fair, I'd recommend
uploading the recently proofed scan with BSO in the title.
HTH,
Allison
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Deborah Murray
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:19 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Illusion by Paula Volsky
Hi Lisa,
The version currently on Bookshare is rated as '"fair." So, it may have been
intended as a BSO.
But, the only way to know for certain is to download the book and check the
quality.
The current version was added in 2002. Bookshare standards are higher now
than in 2002, so a rescan is probably in order.
Deborah
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lisa
Gorden-Cushman
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 2:09 PM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Illusion by Paula Volsky
Hi everybody,
I am currently proofing Illusion by Paula Volsky, but I found it in the
collection. Should I reject the book? I am already almost 300 pages into
the book, and I am thinking that there was probably some good reason why
someone scanned it, but I do not want to finish it just to have it rejected
because it is already there. I will also contact the scanner.
Thanks,
Lisa
Other related posts:
