[aztec-users] Re: Script Window And editing

  • From: Jordan Wilberding <diginux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: aztec-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:07:50 -0500

Hello all,

I wouldn't mind the ctrl+enter for executing...

Richard and Alexander, exactly what is wrong with going this way?

-Jordan Wilberding

> On Friday 12 July 2002 15:58, you wrote:
> Its a horrible trade off, but there are not very many ways to handle it.
>
> The reason its there is because its a milti line control, and there are two
> things that the enter key should do:
>
> Put a carriage return into the multi line edit control
> Execute the contents of the edit control.
>
> The typical way of handling this is to make one of then ctrl+return, and
> the other one just return. I just picked ctrl+enter for execution, and the
> enter key to add a line. Perhaps a Go button that is clickable would be
> good that also has the keyboard shortcut "ctrl+enter" included in its tool
> tip.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aztec-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:aztec-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Alexander Enzmann
> > Sent: Friday, 12 July 2002 11:47 PM
> > To: aztec-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [aztec-users] Re: Script Window And editing
> >
> >
> >
> > Phil,
> >
> > I'm not too sure about the ctl+enter combo.  Why can't it just be Enter?
> >
> > Xander
> >
> > Phillip Martin wrote:
> > > In my local Aztec development area, I have merged the console
> >
> > window and the
> >
> > > script window together into one, so the console window now
> >
> > edits javascript
> >
> > > commands and exectures them. The edit box is now a multi line
> >
> > edit window,
> >
> > > and it has a command history, accesible via the ctrl+up arrow
> >
> > and ctrl+down
> >
> > > arrow. Commands are exectued using ctrl+enter (Since the enter
> >
> > key is used
> >
> > > to put in carriage retunrs in the editor). The script window is
> > > entirely replaced, and it is intented that it will be removed.
> > >
> > > I just wanted to make sure those changes sound all right to most
> > > people, orif anyone has any other ideas before I go ahead and commit
> > > them.
> > >
> > > Phil

Other related posts: