Hi Rick, "For the sake of ..." Would you give us the GPS coordinates you measured for the runway intersection? (Probably has been stated before on this list....) :>)) THX for the details... Gene Lucas On 2/15/2012 10:15, saguaroastro@xxxxxxx wrote: > For the sake of completeness to the point of overkill, here is the > methodology I used. > > Please note no GPS units were used for these calculations :) > In Garmin MapSource Topo Software, I created a waypoint at the intersection > of the runways. I used the Measurement tool to drag a line from the Observing > site to the various peaks& saddles within 15 miles of the site. I can then > get the distance,& bearing from the site and the elevation of the point. > > I entered this into a spreadsheet, calculated the Delta h between the two > point in on column, converted the distance from miles to feet in a second > column and did the 10th grade trig in the third. > > I had planned on using the data to create a horizon file for SkyMap pro, my > planetarium software of choice, but given the level of precision in SkyMap is > 1 degree, it seemed somewhat pointless. > > I do however have such a file for the Antennas Site, if anyone using SkyMap > is interested. Given the proximity of the hills to the Southeast& South > there, the horizon does come into play for low latitude objects. > OmegaCentauri barely scrapes over the top of the rise to the immediate south > from there. > > Rick > > ---- "David M. Douglass"<dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Tom and Rick... >> >> Is it safe to assume that the Azimuth's are stated relative to TRUE NORTH >> and the Altitude is stated in Degrees ???? > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.