After writing this I saw others have raised some of the same questions I have raised, but I'll submit it anyway. If their lazer is the one that hit the aircraft it had to have been a lucky shot at something 3,000 feet away. Have you ever tried hitting the light sensor on top a mercury vapor light at only 600 ft? It is very very difficult and requires a steady tripod mount. It seems it will be difficult to prove that their lazer activities were the ones that hit the aircraft and more specifically the front windshield. The article did say there was a "rash" of reported incidents and so apparently others are engaged in the activity. Yes, it is sad that merely because there is some (alleged) evidence of terrorists exploring the use of lazers that now we are immediately suspect if we happen to hit an airplane accidentally while pointing out stars. Further, I would never have guessed that these very small hand lazers could do eye damage 3,000 feet away or cause an accident when you consider the angles involved. At RTMC usually there are many green lazers dancing around on the outside side of the meeting hall while everyone is waiting in their lawn chair for door prizes to begin. I know there have been attempts to stop this by the RTMC officials but without success. If they were really that dangerous, I am sure something more serious would have been done at RTMC to stop it, like calling out the FBI? Stan Jeffmight@xxxxxxx wrote: >It seems the first arrest of a person using a laser to attempt to disable an >airliner is an amateur astronomer who "used it to point out stars to my >daughter". I wonder how long it will be before someone we know is put through >this ordeal i.e. trying to prove their innocence to the federal government. I >hope they give us a special section at Guantanamo Bay. >But with our green laser pointers about to go the way of the dinosaur, their >value will immediately increase. But I guess putting them up on eBay will be >a crime in itself wouldn't it? Jeff > > >-- >See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please >send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > > > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.