[AZ-Observing] Re: Herschel Help
- From: "AJ Crayon" <acrayon@xxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:31:37 -0700
Sorry about not responding in a timely fashion. Turns out we were out
visiting this evening. Regardless thanks to Steve, Ken and Eric for a quick
resolution.
AJ Crayon
Phoenix, AZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Steinberg" <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:06 PM
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Herschel Help
Mystery solved - Last winter I did download the H400 from SAC but also
got one via seds.org. Further checking shows that it's the latter I
originally sourced from but had written "SAC" on a paper copy of the
list. SAC's list was updated prior to my download and so is not the
culprit. Thanks for checking/responding.
Clear skies,
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
stevecoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:35 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Herschel Help
Eric, AJ, et al;
Right now I am in the middle of writing an article and can't look into
this until next week. However, I don't remember a specific SAC list of
the H 400 objects. You can pull them out of the main SAC deep sky list
by the "H" marker. Please let us know if that is what you did.
Maybe the original H 400 from Brenda Branchett is different from the
one now used by the Astronomical League??
AJ or Ken Sikes, can you look into this, please?
Steve Coe
On 15.12.2013 17:04, Eric Steinberg wrote:
> Hi Folks (especially SAC folks):
>
>
> I'm working the Herschel 400, a little more than halfway through and
> have been working from the list on the SAC site. While preparing my
> observing list for the coming new moon, I included NGC1750 (H 43-8)
> as
> listed. Cross-checking the list however, I find that NGC1750 does
> not
> seem to be an H400 object and that there is no 43-8 (or VIII-43 if
> you
> prefer) in the catalog. Not on the SAC list is NGC7814 a galaxy in
> Pegasus (H II-240). Thankfully that seems to be the only
> discrepancy.
>
>
>
> So, is this a known issue or have I missed something? Thanks for any
> insight.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> Ps: anyone know why the SAC list has the H #'s reversed from their
> usual
> format? Thx/
>
>
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and
> please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and
please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
