[AZ-Observing] Re: Herschel Help
- From: "KenGSikes" <kengsikes@xxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:30:23 -0700
After doing some research it seems that NGC 1750, (H VIII-43), was at one
time on the Herschel 400 list, but it is no longer a 400 object. My copy of
"The Herschel Objects" (2005 edition) I purchased thru the Astronomical
League does show it as a 400 object. The current list on the AL web site
does not list it a one of the 400.
http://www.astroleague.org/al/obsclubs/herschel/h400lstn.html
NGC 1750, (H II-240), is not listed as one of the 400, but NGC 7814 is
listed in SAC 7.2 as well as on the current AL web page, but not in my copy
of "The Herschel Objects".
Ken Sikes
----- Original Message -----
From: <stevecoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:35 PM
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Herschel Help
Eric, AJ, et al;
Right now I am in the middle of writing an article and can't look into
this until next week. However, I don't remember a specific SAC list of
the H 400 objects. You can pull them out of the main SAC deep sky list
by the "H" marker. Please let us know if that is what you did.
Maybe the original H 400 from Brenda Branchett is different from the
one now used by the Astronomical League??
AJ or Ken Sikes, can you look into this, please?
Steve Coe
On 15.12.2013 17:04, Eric Steinberg wrote:
> Hi Folks (especially SAC folks):
>
>
> I'm working the Herschel 400, a little more than halfway through and
> have been working from the list on the SAC site. While preparing my
> observing list for the coming new moon, I included NGC1750 (H 43-8)
> as
> listed. Cross-checking the list however, I find that NGC1750 does
> not
> seem to be an H400 object and that there is no 43-8 (or VIII-43 if
> you
> prefer) in the catalog. Not on the SAC list is NGC7814 a galaxy in
> Pegasus (H II-240). Thankfully that seems to be the only
> discrepancy.
>
>
>
> So, is this a known issue or have I missed something? Thanks for any
> insight.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> Ps: anyone know why the SAC list has the H #'s reversed from their
> usual
> format? Thx/
>
>
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and
> please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
