And later came ISO 9001 which will be renewed at the end of this year.
jd
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul Breed
Sent: zaterdag 25 juli 2015 6:30
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: looks like a bad day
M view of iso-9000
http://www.rasdoc.com/paul/THAG.gif
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Robert Steinke <robert.steinke@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ideally, an organization can continuously improve their defined processes, but
ISO doesn't require it, and doing so requires continuous updating and
recertification of ISO documentation so it's not a common practice.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Uwe Klein <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 23.07.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Bill Claybaugh:
A larger problem with ISO is that it simply embeds whatever practices
happen to be in practice at the time it is adopted; far to many
aerospace organizations fail to seek out and adapt best practices in
part because ISO offers the appearance of order.
ISO tacks down a defined process.
It doesn't care if the process is fit for the objective or not.
.. at one time here they wanted to boost the local kindergarten
to "ISO 9000 certified" levels.
Uwe
