[AR] Re: ORS-4 ("Super Strypi") Hawaii launch delayed

  • From: "rcktman" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rcktman" for DMARC)
  • To: "arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 13:26:14 -0500

Uwe:

The data set of all launches to orbit 1980 - 2010 shows solid rockets having
about 1/2 the failure rate of liquid rockets.

Bill


Sent from my Commodore 64.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [AR] Re: ORS-4 ("Super Strypi") Hawaii launch delayed
Local Time: November 3 2015 11:18 am
UTC Time: November 3 2015 6:18 pm
From: uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Am 03.11.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Henry Vanderbilt:

My experience is, it doesn't matter how conceptually simple the

propulsion concept is. By the time it's integrated into an actual

operationally interesting vehicle, real world considerations will

dictate that the overall package will be complex.



(And if the vehicle actually does stay simple, there's a good chance

real-world considerations have been ignored and will come back to bite

it once it's flying. Naming no obvious examples...)



What is the failure rate for solid boosters if we

ignore BuSabInternal effects.





Hmm, stage trees.



uwe

Other related posts: