On 29/11/12 21:46, Graeme Gill wrote: > Sebastian Schubert wrote: >> I use a Dell U2711, and so far the DTP94 in the Quato bundle with iColor >> Display 3 and its generic wide gamut correction in the software. Is the >> i1 Display Pro superior? > > Hi, > it's hard to say - it depends how uniform the DTP94's are (or > whether Quato are creating calibrations for each unit of the DTP94 > they ship), and how similar your particular display is to the display > the instrument calibration was created for. It could be quite good. Ok. >> In particular, do I understand it correctly >> that the wide gamut correction is included in the device, so that I can >> use ArgyllCMS without the need of a correction? > > I'd be a little surprised if the calibration is in the device (DTP94), > although it's technically possible. If you can select the display type > in the software, then it's not in the device. Comparing two > readings of the same color using the different software can give you > an indication too. Sorry, my formulation was quite misleading. As far as I know the generic wide gamut correction of the DTP94 with iColor Display 3 is inside the software and with Argyll I would indeed need a CCMX file. My question was more concerning the i1 Display Pro: Is the wide gamut correction included in this device or is a correction not necessary anymore? Or is it still in the software so X-Rite can advertise it as being compatible with wide gamut screens? I do not have a spectrometer available so this would be interesting to know because I cannot judge how good the generic wide gamut correction of my current Dell + DTP94 + iColor Display 3 is. Thank you for your clarifications, Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
