Thanks that works! I did some some further testing and comparison, and noticed that with ArgyllCMS I still get less shadow details than the profile created using X-rite's OEM software(ICC v2). Using photoshop's curve tool, the lowest discernible shadow details using x-rite profile is 2. With ArgyllCMS profile it's 4. I don't see any noticeable color casts in the shadows by either profile. I also get less gamut volume with the ArgyllCMS: 1,114,180 vs 1,087.920 Below is the DispcalGUI screenshot for the settings I used, please let me know if there're anything I haven't optimized. Because I would really love to use ArgyllCMS for my main calibration tool for its powerful features and flexibilty. But for now the x-rite OEM software seems to give superior result yet taking a fraction of the time. DispcalGUI setting screen shot: http://tinyurl.com/3vw7o9y I also ran "Very Profile", I'm not entirely sure but it also seems to agree that the x-rite profile is oeverall slightly more accurate? x-rite profile verification: http://tinyurl.com/44eptzd argyllcms profile verification: http://tinyurl.com/4yqu4km Any help and inputs are greatly appreciated! Xun On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Florian Höch <lists+argyllcms@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Am 09.09.2011 20:28, schrieb xun wang: > > Is there anyway I could create a "single gamma + matrix" file for >> Colormunki using the existing saved calculation data without running >> through the "Calibreate & profile" process again? it's painfully slow >> when I use "adaptive hires" + Black Drift Compensation for the Colormunki. >> > > Yes, you can use the existing ColorMunki data to create a new profile from > it. (using the commandline tools, give the existing .ti3 as last argument to > colprof. Or if you use dispcalGUI, set the desired profile type, then in the > "Options" menu -> "Create profile from measurement data...", then select the > .ti3 file) > > -- > Florian Höch > > >