Wim Hertog wrote: > Now, the above workflow results in some strange outcomes: the colours of > the softproof in photoshop are completely off (the same happens when I > convert to above generated icc file). The image prints ok (ok doesn't > mean as good as I want though), nothing like the softproof shows. > However, when I don't add the .cal file to the icm (last step), the > softproof is perfect but the actual printed image is horribly wrong. As suggested in the tutorial, get just profiling working first. There are too many variable otherwise, and the first thing you do in diagnosing a problem is break things down into individual steps anyway. Graeme Gill.