Hmm, so the profiling step alone should do the trick then? I thought profiling only characterized the printer and you needed the calibration step in order to actually change the printing behaviour. If the profiling step by itself is enough to create prints matching my (with argyll) calibrated monitor, I must be doing something wrong somewhere... After following the tutorial and profiling the printer the gamut shape and softproof look perfect. Very similar to what I get from PM5. The printout using this profile results in a horrible yellow-brown cast though. I follow my usual workflow while printing: windows CM is turned off in the canon driver and photoshop manages colours using the generated profile. I'm pretty sure it's not double profiling anywhere. I must be doing something wrong somewhere but I literally read the tutorial a 100 times and tried everything and always get the same result: a strong yellow brown cast together with totally blocked shadows. Anyone has any idea what's happening or....a link to another tutorial to double check? Wim 2011/10/20 Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Wim Hertog wrote: > > Now, the above workflow results in some strange outcomes: the colours of > > the softproof in photoshop are completely off (the same happens when I > > convert to above generated icc file). The image prints ok (ok doesn't > > mean as good as I want though), nothing like the softproof shows. > > However, when I don't add the .cal file to the icm (last step), the > > softproof is perfect but the actual printed image is horribly wrong > As suggested in the tutorial, get just profiling working first. There > are too many variable otherwise, and the first thing you do in diagnosing > a problem is break things down into individual steps anyway. > > Graeme Gill. > >