Hello Graeme, thank you for the reply. The files are here: https://rapidshare.com/files/1541734179/CLEditCMYK_Large_v31_144dpi.tif https://rapidshare.com/files/3764817889/DL_ke_ISOcoat_v2-ISOnewspap.icc https://rapidshare.com/files/4179640316/DL_ke_ISOcoat_v2-ISOuncoat.icc https://rapidshare.com/files/575990157/DLedit_ISOnewspap_26v4_arg.tif https://rapidshare.com/files/1484870811/DLedit_ISOuncoat.tif https://rapidshare.com/files/2942775108/ISOcoated_v2_eci.icc https://rapidshare.com/files/932245990/ISOnewspaper26v4.icc https://rapidshare.com/files/1568024015/ISOuncoated.icc sorry for the amount of links but I can only upload one file at once. I have to find another solution if I need to upload files in the future. The test image I used is "CLEditCMYK_Large_v31_144dpi.tif". The device link profiles are " DL_ke_ISOcoat_v2-ISOnewspap.icc" and " DL_ke_ISOcoat_v2-ISOuncoat.icc", the results are "DLedit...tif". The inprofile is "ISOcoated_v2_eci.icc" the outprofiles are " ISOnewspaper26v4.icc" and "ISOuncoated.icc". The device link profiles are not giving exactly similar results but they both produces an over saturation in pixel images. The different TAC for example is ok. Regards Michael Schulz Am 20.06.2011 16:40 Uhr schrieb "Graeme Gill" unter <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Michael Schulz wrote: >> Can I do something to reduce the saturation for cmyk2cmyk-gamut-conversion >> for pixel images? May be using an abstract profile with collink? > > Hi, that's kind of unexpected if the profiles are at all similar. > Could you mail me an example ? (ie. mail me the the profiles involved > or send me a link to them.) > > thanks, > Graeme Gill. >
