Maybe a larger court room this Friday? :-)
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:20 PM William Pritchard <
drwilliampritchard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neil, I was there last Friday. It is a small court room. I am sure
investors can easily fill it too capacity.
See you Friday.
Bill
On Jul 30, 2019, at 7:44 PM, Neil & Marilyn <nmr1311b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Best to get to the door of the courtroom early as I suspect the room will
fill up on Friday at 9!
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:27 PM treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I think a person subject to the receivership could file an objection
without a Notice of Claim, but the risk of doing so would be huge. Knapp
is wrong on the law. If the receivership is invalid from the start, the
investors never lose their right to challenge the court`s authority.
Trey
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
-------- Original message --------
From: Julia Pond <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/30/19 5:26 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aem-vanc] Supplemental reply to Nichols objection
It kills me that this Knapp clown at Miller Nash keeps asserting that by
filing a proof of claim you consent to the receivership. He did this in
both replies to objections.
I believe the fact is that you must file a proof of claim before you can
make any objection. Isn’t that the law, Trey?
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
