I think a person subject to the receivership could file an objection without a
Notice of Claim, but the risk of doing so would be huge. Knapp is wrong on the
law. If the receivership is invalid from the start, the investors never lose
their right to challenge the court`s authority. TreySent from my Galaxy Tab A
-------- Original message --------From: Julia Pond <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/30/19 5:26 PM (GMT-07:00) To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject:
[aem-vanc] Supplemental reply to Nichols objection It kills me that this Knapp
clown at Miller Nash keeps asserting that by filing a proof of claim you
consent to the receivership. He did this in both replies to objections.I
believe the fact is that you must file a proof of claim before you can make any
objection. Isn’t that the law, Trey?-- Julia Pond juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
