[aem-vanc] Supplemental reply to Nichols objection

  • From: "Julia Pond" <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:26:48 -0700

It kills me that this Knapp clown at Miller Nash keeps asserting that by filing 
a proof of claim you consent to the receivership. He did this in both replies 
to objections.

I believe the fact is that you must file a proof of claim before you can make 
any objection. Isn’t that the law, Trey?

-- 
 Julia Pond
 juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: