Psych-Evaluations are just another layer-of-FRAUD designed to get you
POISONED. I filed ... well, whatever it was I filed (whether complaint,
estoppel, notice of void-judgement, etc), I basically described that,
due to the magistrate ordering a psych-evaluation with neither my
consent/permission nor knowledge, /knowing/ that psychotropic-drugs are
_toxic_ substances, and, that knowing it is near-impossible for
/anybody/ to _not_ to get «diagnosed» with «something» ...I basically
described it as an act of ATTEMPTED MURDER.
Whilst said magistrate's name does still show up in public, listed as a
judge, and, upon the boards of the court-house, his name is the _only_
name where there are NO «cases» assigned to him (although this might
have something to do with exposing the fraud of the Cestui Que Trust,
and, describing how there was an ADMIRALTY FLAG present at the front of
the court-room)...
I probably should have taken photos of the postings, the ones where the
papers posted onto the walls or the glass-panes show whose names are
assigned to which judge at specified rooms at specific times of the day
along with their case-numbers, for illustration-purposes, but, not to
digress...
...just don't count on ANY «psychiatrist» to have a CLUE (would a
Frenchman be assigned to a German in order for the German to determine
whether the Frenchman is «competent» at speaking Japanese [or even
French] ? Similarly, sending a «psychiatrist» to evaluate whether a
«sovereign» [which you are failing to do by the way if you haven't
essentially «taken command» of the direction of the proceedings as the
de jure judge rather than letting that de facto judge lead you by the
bull-horns] is «competent» at «law» is like that... I am of the opinion
that /such/ a «condition» should be OBJECTED on the rounds that
psychiatrists neither study nor know anything about LAW; and, IF the
«psychiatrist» INSISTS upon doing ANYTHING that even /may/ result in
/any/ kind of forced drugging, assuming the matter gets that far, I
would think it prudent to put said psychiatrist ON NOTICE /that/, IF he
/think//s/ him«qualified» to «evaluate» matters of LAW, then, he should
have NO PROBLEM being able to «defend himself in court» on his OWN, and
WITHOUT A LAWYER/ATTORNEY, otherwise, I would also deem said
«psychiatrist» as «incompetent» to evaluate).
Side-Note : I have been through these «evaluations» before, and,
/despite/ scoring /well-over/ 85% (or even over 90%) in EVERY category,
the ONE thing that these dumb-ass idiot-psychiatrists used as a
determination of «non-competence» was because I would NOT answer that
«cops» are some-how the «good guys» (like, seriously, what kind of moron
living under a god-damn ROCK in this day and age believes that «cops»
are «good guys» with ALL of the statistics/reports/videos/etc., of
MURDER and TREASON being committed by cops on a DAILY freaking
basis).../! /You are better off just «calling off» the «evaluation» if
you don't want to end up getting potentially «institutionalised» and
«stuck» within some sort of psych-ward; I don't know where you're at in
your learning/study/journey of establishing your sovereignty, but, I
would «claim my throne» (metaphorically speaking) before them, and,
/immediately/ start issuing the ORDERS that THEY (/*MY*/ Servants, yes,
/*SERVANTS*/) are /supposed /to be following, even if I have to /sternly
/say: «SERVANT /!/ [pointing at black-robed pseud-judge] You are now
forbidden from speaking /any further/ until I give you permission to
continue speaking... [black-robed imposter may try to order the bailiffs
to arrest the king, but, the bailiffs are also under MY «orders» and had
/best/ stay _put_ IF they do not wish for TREASON to show up in their
criminal-record-histories for they _are_ under OATH and the King is
supposed to be knowledgeable of the contents of said Oath]» (followed by
all of my «King's Directives» such as Ordering them to bring out a
Stenographer or to start Stenographing, and, all sorts of other things
to «Control the Court-Room» so-to-speak, get pertinent information
on-record, etc., etc., just know that, for anybody who is /even
thinking/ about trying this out, I hope you have done your «homework» on
«royal-society» and «kingly duties» in order to know what kinds of
«responsibilities» the «king» has when he starts commanding a court-room)...
On 2022/04/24 18:38, Baird Fairbairn wrote:
I appreciate all the articles you guys send.
I do have a question for you guys. I went to court last week to ditch this bar "defender" to do the work needed on my case.
The judge explained that I would need to do my Psych evaluations that the public "defender" suggested in her motion 11(the only movement from defense on this case) since December.
I have been trying to get her to file motions and submit my status paperwork to establish standing. She refused her last excuse was let's see what happens at the psych evaluations and court in May which if not for the rule 11 motion she filed would be the end of the rope.due to my right to a speedy trial. But now her advice is wait to see what happens at the psych evals/courtdate. psych evals are tomorrow and Tuesday.
I can't help to wonder why they are so hell bent on these psych evaluations. Anyone of the times I actually chose to speak nobody in the right mind could assume I was inept. Should I just stop playing their games and stop jumping through hoops obtain the gsa bonds ? I'm fully aware of the fraudulent proceedings that take place at the court house.
I have recieved my passport filing as a national. I've filed the ucc1, amended and ucc3. And filed the common law copyright with the county. Notified the attorney general, the state Attorney and all parties of my status change. Please let me know I'm at the point now that I'm done playing their games.
Baird concerned American
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 9:19 AM dr.richard.cordero_esq <dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of
this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of
/We the People/; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/><left panel
↓Register;or+ NeworUsers>Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this
article -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is foundhere
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>and
downloadable through the next link.
*Advocates of Honest Judiciaries
thinking critically andtaking action
at the most propitious time
to persuade journalists to investigate judges' abuse of power; and
to set in motion a national, single issue, civic movement for
judicial abuse exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform*
*
*
By*
*
*
*
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
*Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx <http://verizon.net> ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
<http://yahoo.com>
DearAdvocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your emails.
*A. The need to take action now*
1. I appreciate your sharing my article with others by clicking
“*Reply All*” and “*Send*”. Although you may receive the same
article repeatedly, by so doing you are sharing it with different
blocs of addressees in the To: box.
2. We need people who take action at this most propitious time for
exposing judges’ abuse of power andfinancial criminality
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>,
as explained hereunder.
3. Indeed, we are all united by our commitment to attaining one
common objective: to expose judges’ abuse and criminality and
obtain compensation for the harm that judges have caused us.
4. That commitment requires effort to read, reread, and read again
the below article until you understand the out-of-court strategy
to inform and outrage the national public so that it demands that
journalists and primarying politicians expose judges and hold them
accountable and liable to compensate the victims of their abuse
and criminality.
a. Here applies the axiom of strategic thinking, "Those who cannot
do the least cannot do more". Those who cannot read even an
article written for their benefit will keep roboticly seeking
their remedy alone in court only to be further abused by
judges...and will keep whining about it.
5. The required effort includes sharing this article and my other
ones by *clicking "Reply All" and "Send"*; and posting it to
social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google
Plus, Pinterest, Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsAp
Tweet: Tell journalists and politicians your story of judges'
abuse of power to participate in unprecedented citizens hearings
and demand compensation and
reform;http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf>
6. This group is not a law debating society. Nor a mutual
commiseration therapy group.
7. We are people committed to implementing the above-stated
out-of-court inform and outrage strategy by forming a national,
single issue, civic movement for judicial abuse of power exposure,
compensation of abusees, and reform.
8. If you are truly committed to the effort of informing and
outraging the national public, let nothing derail you from its
pursuit. When you receive an email that is off subject,
uninformative, or otherwise inappropriate, politely let the sender
know…or simply click delete, which is what I do to any email that
uses foul language, for that is totally unacceptable. We will not
let the bad and unprofessional behavior of some people justify
judges' dismissal of pro ses and all other Advocates of Honest
Judiciaries as 'a bunch of disgruntled losers'. Far from it, we
want the national public, journalists, and primarying politicians
recognize and look up to us as Champions of Justice.
9. If you ask me to remove you from my emailing list because you
are receiving too many and unhelpful emails, that means that the
effort to click "Delete" is more harmful to you than all the abuse
that you allegedly suffered or are suffering at the hands of
judges. Lucky for you, you have not been and are not being abused
at all.
10./Take action!/ Read, Share, Write and realize…
B. The need to analyze with critical judgment everything we hear
or read
11. Your link, advocate Tak, characterizes the complaint filed by
a neighbor of Ardee as “baseless”. Understandably, that upset you
given that it led to Ardee’s 72-hour commitment to a psychiatric ward.
12. Now you have to use critical judgment to analyze that link,
never mind the article downloaded through it.
13. You cannot simply jump to the conclusion, perhaps in line with
your experience, that the complaint was “baseless” just because it
was so characterized by somebody somewhere. That would only show
bias toward believing anything that was negative about ‘the
system’ or ‘the police’ or ‘social services’.
14. You always need to be critical even when the information that
you receive supports your beliefs.
15. Hence, ask yourself:
a. Who wrote that article?
b. How much do they have to lose or gain by stating something
sensationalist?
c. Do they make money depending on how many times people view
their articles and click their advertisement spots?
d. Do they work for a reputable publisher worth suing for
defamation for making incorrect statements, a risk that increases
its interest in ensuring that all its statements are correct?
e. Or do they work for a no-name start-up digital publisher that
can hardly pay for its Internet connection so it is only
interested in increasing itsnumber of clickers even if they are a
full fool follower complement?
16. The complaint was filed by “a neighbor”. So ask yourself:
a. How many times before had that neighbor complained about Ardee?
b. What was the nature of those complaints?
c. Was there violence or threats to someone’s or the public’s safety?
d. If Ardee had been harmed because none of his/her neighbors
cared enough to abide by the public safety instruction, “If you
see something, say something”, would you blame the neighbors for
their crass self-centeredness and culpable indifference?
e. If your neighbors did not bother to alert the authorities when
they had reason to believe that you were in danger, would you feel
safer or so much lonelier and abandoned?
17. You need to be critical at all times…because there is ALWAYS
only six feet away from you the attorney for the opposing party,
who is paying attention to every word that you say and do not say
and is taking notes. And when it is her turn, she will
cross-examine you.
18. And if you were never critical of what you heard or read and
simply used it if it comforted your prejudices, that is, your
previous judgments, that opposing counsel will tear you to pieces
on the stand in front of the jury and the journalists in the
audience in court and out of court via video conference! And you
will have let all of us down.
19. And when you step down from the witness stand and walk to your
seat you are going to feel so very small, humiliated, and
dissatisfied with yourself because you failed to think critically:
You could and should have asked yourself those questions.
20. That is why you are going to think critically! So, on the
stand you will earn the respect and the attention of everybody,
including the judge, all of us, and the national public because
everybody realizes that you are a responsible, fair, and
thoughtful person. You meet the legal standard of “a reasonable,
impartial observer who proceeded responsibly under the
circumstances to inform herself of the facts”.
21. Help us become like you. Set the right example. Teach pro ses
to think critically so that we all earn public respect and support.
1. An exercise inthinking critically
22. Practice analyzing the subject line of this email:
Re: What did Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Thomas know
about judges’ abuse of power and when did they know it?
23. Does that subject line show that I am racist because I make
reference to Judge Jackson and Justice Thomas given that they are
the two most talked-about jurists at the moment, and they happen
to be Black, or does it show that I want journalists and
politicians to cross-examine them to expose the ‘abuse of powerby
judges’, who include all those judges who are white, yellow,
brown, male, female, Christian, Muslim, Hispanic, whatever!?
24. “Judges” are the ones that my subject line criticizes for
abusing power, not the two named jurists who knew about it or
should have known had they proceeded with due diligence to
safeguard the integrity of judicial process. The questions that
the subject line implicitly asks of them are:
a. What did they do based on that knowledge or do they lack any
knowledge because they engaged in willful blindness and willful
ignorance?(jur:90§§b-c
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>)
b. Did they use their knowledge or their means of gaining it to
ensure the integrity of judicial process or did they disregard it
to cover up for their “brothers and sisters of the robe” and avoid
being treated as their traitors?
c. Have they shown enough respect for judicial integrity to remain
on the bench or should their complicit conduct cause such outrage
out of court in an informed public as to deprive them of public
trust, thus requiring that they resign…together with the abusive
judges that they covered up for?
25. It is imperative for Advocates, including all pro ses, to
think critically at every step of the way toward forming a
movement for judicial exposure of judges' abuse, compensation, and
reform, so that they may be recognized and followed by the
national public as its Champions of Justice.
C. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
26. Lip service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the
abusers.
27. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and quest for
justice are.
28. Support the professional law research and writing, and
strategic thinking at:
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>**
DONATE
by making a deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill
Pay feature of your online account or Zelle
from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
//
//
/Dare trigger history!/...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx>
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b>
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud
storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq.
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
and^† >OL2:1114§G
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>,
when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and
paste it in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
*******************************
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of
this email.
You are encouraged to *share* and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of
/We the People/; e.g*., click “Reply All” and send*.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go
tohttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/><left panel
↓Register or + New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this
article -as such likely to be free of irregularities- is foundhere
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>and
downloadable through the next link.
*Journalists interested in a scoop and a Pulitzer Prize;
primarying politicians; and*
*those outraged by /The Wall Street Journal/ finding in only a
sample of cases that *
“131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had
a Financial Interest”*,
yet they have been *
*neither investigated by either their Federal Judiciary or former
chief judge now Attorney General Merrick Garland,*
*nor required to disgorge the gains that they grabbed,*
*can use the official statistics of his and J. Ketanji Brown
Jackson’s District of Columbia Circuit
to show their participation in a cover-up*
*concerning their peers' law-breaking and other forms of abuse of
power, and effected by
dismissing 100% of complaints against their peers and *
*denying 100% of petitions to review those dismissals,*
*thus revealing their lack of courage to expose their peers’ abuse
and
interest*
*in not being shunned as traitors but rather *
*in being accepted by their "brothers and sisters of the robe"*
*at the expense of the complainants and*
*the integrity of the system of justice, left to fester with*
*the underlying and untreated cause for complaint:*
*judges emboldened by reciprocally ensuring the risklessness of
their abuse*
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-*journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>
By
**
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
*Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform**
*New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx <http://verizon.net/> ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/> , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
<http://yahoo.com/>
Dear Journalists, Politicians, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
1. Justice nominee Ketanji
<https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>Brown Jackso
<https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+KBJ>n
was confirmed by the Senate on April 7, 2022. However, she will
not take her seat on the Supreme Court until the end of this term
in the summer. This affords a unique opportunity to journalists,
including the media outlets for which they work, who want to make
a scoop that can lead to their winning a Pulitzer Prize;
principled and opportunistic primarying politicians; and people
interested in the integrity of the judiciary:
a. They can examine the integrity and character of J. Brown
Jackson and of former chief judge now Attorney General(AG) Merrick
Garland in light of the official reports and statistics of their
District of Columbia Circuit. There she sat as a trial judge from
2013 to 2021, and has sat as an appellate judge of the Court of
Appeals
<https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/Courthouse+Information>
for that Circuit(CADCC
<https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>) since June 2021;
and he served as that Court's chief judge from 2013 to 2020.
b. It follows that the comments made here referring to J. Brown
apply even more forcefully to Now-AG and Then-Judge and even Chief
Judge Garland, as they do to Justice Clarence Thomas. Hence, such
application is not made explicit in every instance.
A. The official statistics on complaints against judges
2. Those reports and statistics
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/directors-annual-report>
are submitted by the 13 U.S. courts of appeals, including CADCC,
and 2 national courts to Congress as a public document in the
Annual Report
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/judicial-business-united-states-courts>of
theDirector
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/annual-report-2021>
of the Administrative Office <https://www.uscourts.gov/> of the
U.S. Courts. The director is appointed by the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court under Title 28 of the U.S. Code [of federal law
only] section 601(28 U.S.C
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>. §601).
3. Complaints against judges of a circuit can be filed by any
person, including a judge, under the Judicial Conduct and
Disability Act of 1980(the Act; id.
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml> §§351-364). The
complaint statistics have appeared for most of those years in
Table S-22 of the Annual Report. I have compiled
<http://10.http//Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_collected_statistics_complaints_v_judges.pdf>
and tabulated them for ease of presentation and analysis. Those
statistics show that for decades, federal judges have dismissed
100% of complaints
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_JJ_Kavanaugh-Garland_exoneration_policy.pdf>
against their peers and denied 100% of petitions to review those
dismissals.
4. Indeed, the introduction
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/complaints-against-judges-judicial-business-2021>
toTable S-22
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics/table/s-22/judicial-business/2021/09/30>
for 2021 states the following concerning complaint
