if you have a public defender and you dont want her like any lawyer you
fire her. its because they want to paste you as incompetent, therefore not
sovereign and free as we all already are and acting together to try to
coerce you. when they have a psychiatrists start asking you questions start
recording and tell them you dont consent to any medical proceedings then
ask them if whats going on is any of their business. if they say no direct
them to say you passed the psyc eval then leave, if they go on to ask what
you mean, say your building a case against them and whoever else wants to
give you a psyc eval for rico, coercion, medical coercion [medical and
securities fraud on part of the public impersonators and psycologist],
conspiracy to deprive rights, depervation of rights under color of law,
violations of the iccpr, as well as the geneva convention [ie war crimes]
and unless they want to be attached to the claim act accordingly say you
passed the eval and to let you go; because your not consenting to be a
political or medical prisoner.
if they decide their going to take you hostage call 911 on them then when
your done start telling people you know so they know where you are and to
spread the word that they have taken you hostage. thats basically what
ramola d did when they did that to her, boris just asks if its any of their
business then if they want it to be, i go to directly building a case
against them for trying to essentially make me a political prisoner by
political smear tactis of trying to paint me incompetant or crazy for
something judges are required to be versed on, first and fourth amendment
protected activity and either they brush that eval under the rug or i opt
to start runnin their rope up a tree to lynch them in the form of their
pocket and/or their job.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022, 7:38 PM Baird Fairbairn <b2ready2001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I appreciate all the articles you guys send.
I do have a question for you guys. I went to court last week to ditch
this bar "defender" to do the work needed on my case.
The judge explained that I would need to do my Psych evaluations
that the public "defender" suggested in her motion 11(the only movement
from defense on this case) since December.
I have been trying to get her to file motions and submit my status
paperwork to establish standing. She refused her last excuse was let's see
what happens at the psych evaluations and court in May which if not for the
rule 11 motion she filed would be the end of the rope.due to my right to a
speedy trial. But now her advice is wait to see what happens at the psych
evals/courtdate. psych evals are tomorrow and Tuesday.
I can't help to wonder why they are so hell bent on these psych
evaluations. Anyone of the times I actually chose to speak nobody in the
right mind could assume I was inept. Should I just stop playing their games
and stop jumping through hoops obtain the gsa bonds ? I'm fully aware of
the fraudulent proceedings that take place at the court house.
I have recieved my passport filing as a national. I've filed the ucc1,
amended and ucc3. And filed the common law copyright with the county.
Notified the attorney general, the state Attorney and all parties of my
status change. Please let me know I'm at the point now that I'm done
playing their games.
Baird concerned American
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 9:19 AM dr.richard.cordero_esq <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We
the People*; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go
to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register; or
+ New or Users >Add New; or fill out the New User form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php ;.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If
it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as
such likely to be free of irregularities- is found here
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>
and downloadable through the next link.
*Advocates of Honest Judiciaries thinking critically and taking action at
the most propitious time to persuade journalists to investigate judges'
abuse of power; and to set in motion a national, single issue, civic
movement for judicial abuse exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform*
By
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. *Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your emails.
*A. The need to take action now*
1. I appreciate your sharing my article with others by clicking “*Reply
All*” and “*Send*”. Although you may receive the same article
repeatedly, by so doing you are sharing it with different blocs of
addressees in the To: box.
2. We need people who take action at this most propitious time for
exposing judges’ abuse of power and financial criminality
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>,
as explained hereunder.
3. Indeed, we are all united by our commitment to attaining one common
objective: to expose judges’ abuse and criminality and obtain compensation
for the harm that judges have caused us.
4. That commitment requires effort to read, reread, and read again the below
article until you understand the out-of-court strategy to inform and
outrage the national public so that it demands that journalists and
primarying politicians expose judges and hold them accountable and liable
to compensate the victims of their abuse and criminality.
a. Here applies the axiom of strategic thinking, "Those who cannot do the
least cannot do more". Those who cannot read even an article written for
their benefit will keep roboticly seeking their remedy alone in court
only to be further abused by judges...and will keep whining about it.
5. The required effort includes sharing this article and my other ones by
*clicking
"Reply All" and "Send"*; and posting it to social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Google
Plus, Pinterest, Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsAp
Tweet: Tell journalists and politicians your story of judges' abuse of
power to participate in unprecedented citizens hearings and demand
compensation and reform; http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2
/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf>
6. This group is not a law debating society. Nor a mutual commiseration
therapy group.
7. We are people committed to implementing the above-stated out-of-court
inform
and outrage strategy by forming a national, single issue, civic movement
for judicial abuse of power exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform.
8. If you are truly committed to the effort of informing and outraging
the national public, let nothing derail you from its pursuit. When you
receive an email that is off subject, uninformative, or otherwise
inappropriate, politely let the sender know…or simply click delete, which
is what I do to any email that uses foul language, for that is totally
unacceptable. We will not let the bad and unprofessional behavior of some
people justify judges' dismissal of pro ses and all other Advocates of
Honest Judiciaries as 'a bunch of disgruntled losers'. Far from it, we want
the national public, journalists, and primarying politicians recognize and
look up to us as Champions of Justice.
9. If you ask me to remove you from my emailing list because you are
receiving too many and unhelpful emails, that means that the effort to
click "Delete" is more harmful to you than all the abuse that you allegedly
suffered or are suffering at the hands of judges. Lucky for you, you have
not been and are not being abused at all.
10.* Take action!* Read, Share, Write and realize…
B. The need to analyze with critical judgment everything we hear or read
11. Your link, advocate Tak, characterizes the complaint filed by a
neighbor of Ardee as “baseless”. Understandably, that upset you given that
it led to Ardee’s 72-hour commitment to a psychiatric ward.
12. Now you have to use critical judgment to analyze that link, never
mind the article downloaded through it.
13. You cannot simply jump to the conclusion, perhaps in line with your
experience, that the complaint was “baseless” just because it was so
characterized by somebody somewhere. That would only show bias toward
believing anything that was negative about ‘the system’ or ‘the police’ or
‘social services’.
14. You always need to be critical even when the information that you
receive supports your beliefs.
15. Hence, ask yourself:
a. Who wrote that article?
b. How much do they have to lose or gain by stating something
sensationalist?
c. Do they make money depending on how many times people view their
articles and click their advertisement spots?
d. Do they work for a reputable publisher worth suing for defamation for
making incorrect statements, a risk that increases its interest in ensuring
that all its statements are correct?
e. Or do they work for a no-name start-up digital publisher that can
hardly pay for its Internet connection so it is only interested in
increasing itsnumber of clickers even if they are a full fool follower
complement?
16. The complaint was filed by “a neighbor”. So ask yourself:
a. How many times before had that neighbor complained about Ardee?
b. What was the nature of those complaints?
c. Was there violence or threats to someone’s or the public’s safety?
d. If Ardee had been harmed because none of his/her neighbors cared
enough to abide by the public safety instruction, “If you see something,
say something”, would you blame the neighbors for their crass
self-centeredness and culpable indifference?
e. If your neighbors did not bother to alert the authorities when they
had reason to believe that you were in danger, would you feel safer or so
much lonelier and abandoned?
17. You need to be critical at all times…because there is ALWAYS only six
feet away from you the attorney for the opposing party, who is paying
attention to every word that you say and do not say and is taking notes.
And when it is her turn, she will cross-examine you.
18. And if you were never critical of what you heard or read and simply
used it if it comforted your prejudices, that is, your previous judgments,
that opposing counsel will tear you to pieces on the stand in front of the
jury and the journalists in the audience in court and out of court via
video conference! And you will have let all of us down.
19. And when you step down from the witness stand and walk to your seat
you are going to feel so very small, humiliated, and dissatisfied with
yourself because you failed to think critically: You could and should have
asked yourself those questions.
20. That is why you are going to think critically! So, on the stand you
will earn the respect and the attention of everybody, including the judge,
all of us, and the national public because everybody realizes that you are
a responsible, fair, and thoughtful person. You meet the legal standard of
“a reasonable, impartial observer who proceeded responsibly under the
circumstances to inform herself of the facts”.
21. Help us become like you. Set the right example. Teach pro ses to
think critically so that we all earn public respect and support.
1. An exercise in thinking critically
22. Practice analyzing the subject line of this email:
Re: What did Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Thomas know about
judges’ abuse of power and when did they know it?
23. Does that subject line show that I am racist because I make reference
to Judge Jackson and Justice Thomas given that they are the two most
talked-about jurists at the moment, and they happen to be Black, or does it
show that I want journalists and politicians to cross-examine them to
expose the ‘abuse of power by judges’, who include all those judges who
are white, yellow, brown, male, female, Christian, Muslim, Hispanic,
whatever!?
24. “Judges” are the ones that my subject line criticizes for abusing
power, not the two named jurists who knew about it or should have known had
they proceeded with due diligence to safeguard the integrity of judicial
process. The questions that the subject line implicitly asks of them are:
a. What did they do based on that knowledge or do they lack any knowledge
because they engaged in willful blindness and willful ignorance?(
jur:90§§b-c
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>)
b. Did they use their knowledge or their means of gaining it to ensure
the integrity of judicial process or did they disregard it to cover up for
their “brothers and sisters of the robe” and avoid being treated as their
traitors?
c. Have they shown enough respect for judicial integrity to remain on the
bench or should their complicit conduct cause such outrage out of court in
an informed public as to deprive them of public trust, thus requiring that
they resign…together with the abusive judges that they covered up for?
25. It is imperative for Advocates, including all pro ses, to think
critically at every step of the way toward forming a movement for judicial
exposure of judges' abuse, compensation, and reform, so that they may be
recognized and followed by the national public as its Champions of Justice.
C. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
26. Lip service advances nothing; but it continues to enable the abusers.
27. Put your money where your outrage at abuse and quest for justice are.
28. Support the professional law research and writing, and strategic
thinking at:
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
DONATE
by making a deposit or an online transfer through either the Bill Pay
feature of your online account or Zelle
from your account
to TD Bank account # 43 92 62 52 45, routing # 260 13 673;
or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021 000 089.
*Dare trigger history!*...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform <http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud
storage accounts described at *>ggl:1 et seq.
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>
and † >OL2:1114§G
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>,
when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it
in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your email
reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
*******************************
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to *share* and post it to social media
as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We
the People*; e.g*., click “Reply All” and send*.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register
or + New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as
such likely to be free of irregularities- is found here
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-join_demand_for_compensation_from_judges.pdf>
and downloadable through the next link.
*Journalists interested in a scoop and a Pulitzer Prize; primarying
politicians; and*
*those outraged by The Wall Street Journal finding in only a sample of
cases that *
“131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a
Financial Interest”
*, yet they have been *
*neither investigated by either their Federal Judiciary or former chief
judge now Attorney General Merrick Garland,*
*nor required to disgorge the gains that they grabbed,*
*can use the official statistics of his and J. Ketanji Brown Jackson’s
District of Columbia Circuit to show their participation in a cover-up*
*concerning their peers' law-breaking and other forms of abuse of power,
and effected by dismissing 100% of complaints against their peers and *
*denying 100% of petitions to review those dismissals,*
*thus revealing their lack of courage to expose their peers’ abuse and
interest*
*in not being shunned as traitors but rather *
*in being accepted by their "brothers and sisters of the robe"*
*at the expense of the complainants and*
*the integrity of the system of justice, left to fester with*
*the underlying and untreated cause for complaint:*
*judges emboldened by reciprocally ensuring the risklessness of their
abuse*
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-
*journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf>
By
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. *Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!PY4aQo0kSSVmCvJYwi34VOtRYRGqqcPf6wbln0aXWysDSiIVN-5fBGEixsussQVaXbRmbJA$>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Journalists, Politicians, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
1. Justice nominee Ketanji
<https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite> Brown Jackso
<https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL+-+Judges+-+KBJ>
n was confirmed by the Senate on April 7, 2022. However, she will not
take her seat on the Supreme Court until the end of this term in the
summer. This affords a unique opportunity to journalists, including the
media outlets for which they work, who want to make a scoop that can lead
to their winning a Pulitzer Prize; principled and opportunistic primarying
politicians; and people interested in the integrity of the judiciary:
a. They can examine the integrity and character of J. Brown Jackson and
of former chief judge now Attorney General (AG) Merrick Garland in light
of the official reports and statistics of their District of Columbia
Circuit. There she sat as a trial judge from 2013 to 2021, and has sat as
an appellate judge of the Court of Appeals
<https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/Courthouse+Information>
for that Circuit(CADCC <https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite>)
since June 2021; and he served as that Court's chief judge from 2013 to
2020.
b. It follows that the comments made here referring to J. Brown apply
even more forcefully to Now-AG and Then-Judge and even Chief Judge Garland,
as
they do to Justice Clarence Thomas. Hence, such application is not made
explicit in every instance.
A. The official statistics on complaints against judges
2. Those reports and statistics
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/directors-annual-report>
are submitted by the 13 U.S. courts of appeals, including CADCC, and 2
national courts to Congress as a public document in the Annual Report
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/analysis-reports/judicial-business-united-states-courts>of
the Director
<https://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/annual-report-2021> of the
Administrative Office <https://www.uscourts.gov/> of the U.S. Courts.
The director is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court under
Title 28 of the U.S. Code [of federal law only] section 601(28 U.S.C
<https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>. §601).
3. Complaints against judges of a circuit can be filed by any person,
including a judge, under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of
1980(the Act; id. <https://uscode.house.gov/download/download.shtml>
