Nelson, so they "STORMed"? meaning by force? from my watch they walked in
and even some welcomed them and doors wide open also
DC is foreign it doesn't belong docked on dry land of the uSA.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:28 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
*Ray,*
*With all due respect, I believe those that stormed the capitol are guilty
because, *
*The original Constitution authorized a District not exceeding 10 miles
square.*
*One could maybe even state correctly that any part of 63 sq miles of
Maryland today that is “Washington, D.C. overlay zone is legitimate
Federal Property*
*So, I think those that insurrected hadn’t learned about the jurisdiction
of Washington D.C.*
*Like Storming Ft. McHerry rtc, a military facility etc established prior
to 1860*
*From: *Ray Greninger <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent: *Monday, July 19, 2021 6:16 PM
*To: *administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject: *[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Public Building
Library videotaping freedoms
Hmmm, those buildings are public property. The schmucks just occupy them.
Nancy, the old bag, was beside herself (for the cameras) when the people
“stormed” into their own property on the day of the “ insurrection.” We
cant have the peasants entering their own capitol building, now can we?
The corporation doesn’t own anything when all is said and done. If any
entity can be said to own that stuff (entities can’t really own anything
regardless of what they claim) it would be The United States of America.
That is the original entity that administers the public property, including
The United States, the United States and UNITED STATES etc.
On Jul 19, 2021, at 3:25 PM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They own the building so have authority but the Constitution states their
limited to what they own. Fine line
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:31 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley,
if my local library is a subsidiary of the City of Ocean City, and a state
statute says i cannot film people or employees while i am there, and yet,
the city has surveillance cameras, does 1.8.17 preclude them from
successfully charging me with a statute violation if i videotape my
interactions with employees?
i have video of one fabricating evidence against me and now the library is
possibly looking to trespass me.
thnaks
nelson
--
Life in one word--LOVE
