We don't trust those pointless criticisms, but focus on the knowledge n
message.
If you can't be intelligent, be objective at least.
You offer no better solutions, but take away people's learning thru proven,
stupid bias.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, 16:09 Joe Skelton <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just a word of warning, please stay away from Paul and Anna. I have tried
to warn you before. You do what you think you want to do, but check these
people out before you get in too deep.
On Sunday, January 31, 2021, 04:33:46 AM CST, Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Say what you want but «Remote-Viewing» *is* a *legitimate science* and
not mere clairvoyance (nor so-called pseudo-science). I have examined the
works of para-psychologists (*and* their «debunkers») for a number of
years now. The mis-information and dis-information coming out of the
self-professing «skeptics» crowd (although calling them «skeptics» is
actually more of a mis-nomer since, in reality, they are actually
*pseudo-skeptics*), and the pseudo-skeptic crowd literature reads a lot
more like some sort of fundamentalist religion than anything that is even
remotely scientific (faith-based rather than fact-based or evidence-based;
they waste so much time trying to «maintain a null-belief» that they see
not their own arrogance/hypocrisy nor lack of ability to be *humble*).
There is good reason to be skeptical about so-called skeptics (
https://www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org/ ;).
Remote-Viewing has been used for various military applications and is
fairly well-documented by now for anybody who is capable of doing more than
just mere «cursory glance» style so-called research (such as literally
finding missing planes/ships/craft/etc briefly referenced at
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/07/13/us-government-uses-remote-viewing-parapsychology-to-locate-a-lost-spy-plane-in-africa/
and
a number of other «credible» sources).
Whilst I have not looked at Holmseth *specifically*, for as far as
*Remote-Viewing* is concerned, *that* is a *legitimate* protocol that
produces *consistent* and *repeatable* *results*, even from different
remote-viewers at completely different locations/countries in the world who
have never even met nor heard of each other, even under double-blind and
even «triple-blind» conditions. For that matter...:
«In fact, research by Harvard University specialists in scientific
methods showed that the best experimental psi research today is not only
conducted according to proper scientific standards, but usually adheres
to more rigorous protocols than are found in contemporary research in both
the social and physical sciences. In addition, over the years there have
been a number of very effective rebuttals of criticisms of individual
studies, and within the past decade, experimental procedures have been
developed that address virtually all methodological criticisms, even the
possibility of fraud and collusion, by including skeptics in the
experimental procedures.» -Response by [Dr.] Dean Radin about common but
mis-guided/mis-informed criticisms against para-psychology (i.e.:
psi-research).
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more
progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its
existence.” ― Nikola Tesla
There's already too much mis-information and dis-information abound in
this world-and-age-of-deception (also in reference to «even the elect
will/shall be deceived» during the end-days), and faith-based
materialist-paradigm pseudo-skeptics, absolutely far too many of them whose
behaviour resembles that of those who auto-throw out the baby with the
bath-water. What can I say ? [Rhetorical] May as well just insert one of
those face-palming meme-images any time I see anything that resembles
pseudo-skepticism...
------ オリジナルメッセージ ------
差出人: "Justin Ross" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
宛先: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
送信日時: 2021-01-31 12:35:27 AM
件名: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Must spread far n wide: My
God, My God....
I'm not offended, either by the messenger or even the message itself. I
do care about human trafficking and child abuse and I have spent hours
filing reports with the Internet Watch Foundation, the FBI, Twitter,
Periscope, and Telegram to report child exploiters and get their content
removed. I am not denying human trafficking by pointing out that there are
posers like Holmseth, Gene Decode, Tory Smith, Alice Down the Rabbit Hole,
etc. who publish hyperbolized or even completely fabricated stories that
may get people emotionally invested, but do little if anything to stop
perpetrators or help victims. At the same time they are also giving the
enemy all the ammo they need to shoot down and discredit the truth movement
for those still in the dark. If you are CNN or NBC and you want to
discredit a legitimate conspiracy theory, you just find a more ridiculous
one to conflate it with. That's what the adrenochrome,
Pentagon-pedophile-task-force, frazzledrip, 1000's of kids being rescued
from D.U.M.B.S., and 800,000 missing children per year provides to the
enemy - a bunch of unsubstantiated, distorted and/or fabricated information
to make truthers look ridiculous. And then some extremely suspicious
characters like the Podestas and James Alefantis get relieved of the
negative publicity they were getting, which I suspect they deserved.
As far as missing children numbers, there may have been 800,000 total
incidents of children being reported missing in a given year, but that
number does not represent how many children have disappeared altogether.
An extremely vast majority of those are found again quickly. With only a
few million babies being born per year in America, a number like 800,000
children per year would mean 1/4 of the population is vanishing each year.
In that case almost every family would either have a missing child or know
several others that do. I'm sorry if you think I'm shooting the messenger;
I'm really just trying to warn you about characters like Holmseth because I
believed him and even donated to him until I realized he's making up
fiction and using a source that uses clairvoyance to see how many children
are supposedly getting raped in underground military bases....
On Saturday, January 30, 2021, 3:54:38 PM PST, Shining Emperor <
nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just because you don't know or the messenger offended you, it does not
change the facts or truth.
Pediphile is wide-Human- Trafficking, Child/Trafficking are wide-spread
truth.
Why people can't focus on the research of truth and missing children 800k
per year in America than criticize one who offended him?
Stop shooting the messenger of one video or article and stop being useless
eaters or useful idiots.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 7:09 PM Justin Ross <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I don't mean to be a conspiracy denier or to be critical of Judge Anna,
but the idea that adrenochrome is a recreational drug comes from the movie
Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas. It is an oxidized form of adrenaline and can
be found in spoiled epi-pens. There is no need to torture children to
manufacture epi-pens so there should be no need for that to make
adrenochrome either. I have yet to see any evidence that people can even
get high from taking adrenochrome anyway.
I don't doubt that people in positions of power use crimes against
children for blackmail, but when people like Holmseth pretend to be part of
some "Pentagon pedophile task force" and put out these red herrings about
adrenochrome and "X number of kids were raped/tortured" in some underground
military lab, and I come to find the source of the allegations is some
clairvoyant that does "DNA reading" or "gene decoding," it just muddies the
waters so people have a harder time finding the truth. It's like when
Antifa rioters put on Trump hats and then the media say Trump supporters
caused a riot. It does harm to real pedophilia victims and whistleblowers
and makes it easier for their abusers to discredit them. I know this is
off topic, and Holmseth had me fooled for a while as well, but I hope
people will realize his stuff is made up and stop spreading it.
On Friday, January 29, 2021, 11:48:49 AM PST, Shining Emperor <
nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2021/01/my-god-my-god.html?m=1
