Just a word of warning, please stay away from Paul and Anna. I have tried to
warn you before. You do what you think you want to do, but check these people
out before you get in too deep.
On Sunday, January 31, 2021, 04:33:46 AM CST, Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
#yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801
--blockquote.yiv3198481801cite
{margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:0px;border-left:1px
solid #cccccc;}#yiv3198481801 blockquote.yiv3198481801cite2
{margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:0px;border-left:1px
solid #cccccc;margin-top:3px;padding-top:0px;}#yiv3198481801 a img
{border:0px;}#yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 ,
#yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 , #yiv3198481801
#yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 , #yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801
#yiv3198481801 #yiv3198481801 {list-style-position:inside;}#yiv3198481801 body
{font-family:Meiryo UI;font-size:12pt;}#yiv3198481801 .yiv3198481801quote
{margin-left:1em;margin-right:1em;border-left:5px #ebebeb
solid;padding-left:0.3em;}#yiv3198481801 Say what you want but «Remote-Viewing»
is a legitimate science and not mere clairvoyance (nor so-called
pseudo-science). I have examined the works of para-psychologists (and their
«debunkers») for a number of years now. The mis-information and dis-information
coming out of the self-professing «skeptics» crowd (although calling them
«skeptics» is actually more of a mis-nomer since, in reality, they are actually
pseudo-skeptics), and the pseudo-skeptic crowd literature reads a lot more like
some sort of fundamentalist religion than anything that is even remotely
scientific (faith-based rather than fact-based or evidence-based; they waste so
much time trying to «maintain a null-belief» that they see not their own
arrogance/hypocrisy nor lack of ability to be humble).
There is good reason to be skeptical about so-called skeptics (
https://www.skepticalaboutskeptics.org/ ).Remote-Viewing has been used for
various military applications and is fairly well-documented by now for anybody
who is capable of doing more than just mere «cursory glance» style so-called
research (such as literally finding missing planes/ships/craft/etc briefly
referenced at
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/07/13/us-government-uses-remote-viewing-parapsychology-to-locate-a-lost-spy-plane-in-africa/
and a number of other «credible» sources).
Whilst I have not looked at Holmseth specifically, for as far as Remote-Viewing
is concerned, that is a legitimate protocol that produces consistent and
repeatable results, even from different remote-viewers at completely different
locations/countries in the world who have never even met nor heard of each
other, even under double-blind and even «triple-blind» conditions. For that
matter...:
«In fact, research by Harvard University specialists in scientific methods
showed that the best experimental psi research today is not only conducted
according to proper scientific standards, but usually adheres to more rigorous
protocols than are found in contemporary research in both the social and
physical sciences. In addition, over the years there have been a number of very
effective rebuttals of criticisms of individual studies, and within the past
decade, experimental procedures have been developed that address virtually all
methodological criticisms, even the possibility of fraud and collusion, by
including skeptics in the experimental procedures.» -Response by [Dr.] Dean
Radin about common but mis-guided/mis-informed criticisms against
para-psychology (i.e.: psi-research).
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more
progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” ―
Nikola Tesla
There's already too much mis-information and dis-information abound in this
world-and-age-of-deception (also in reference to «even the elect will/shall be
deceived» during the end-days), and faith-based materialist-paradigm
pseudo-skeptics, absolutely far too many of them whose behaviour resembles that
of those who auto-throw out the baby with the bath-water. What can I say ?
[Rhetorical] May as well just insert one of those face-palming meme-images any
time I see anything that resembles pseudo-skepticism...------ オリジナルメッセージ
------差出人: "Justin Ross" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>宛先:
"administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>送信日時: 2021-01-31 12:35:27
AM件名: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Must spread far n wide: My God,
My God....
I'm not offended, either by the messenger or even the message itself. I do
care about human trafficking and child abuse and I have spent hours filing
reports with the Internet Watch Foundation, the FBI, Twitter, Periscope, and
Telegram to report child exploiters and get their content removed. I am not
denying human trafficking by pointing out that there are posers like Holmseth,
Gene Decode, Tory Smith, Alice Down the Rabbit Hole, etc. who publish
hyperbolized or even completely fabricated stories that may get people
emotionally invested, but do little if anything to stop perpetrators or help
victims. At the same time they are also giving the enemy all the ammo they
need to shoot down and discredit the truth movement for those still in the
dark. If you are CNN or NBC and you want to discredit a legitimate conspiracy
theory, you just find a more ridiculous one to conflate it with. That's what
the adrenochrome, Pentagon-pedophile-task-force, frazzledrip, 1000's of kids
being rescued from D.U.M.B.S., and 800,000 missing children per year provides
to the enemy - a bunch of unsubstantiated, distorted and/or fabricated
information to make truthers look ridiculous. And then some extremely
suspicious characters like the Podestas and James Alefantis get relieved of the
negative publicity they were getting, which I suspect they deserved.
As far as missing children numbers, there may have been 800,000 total incidents
of children being reported missing in a given year, but that number does not
represent how many children have disappeared altogether. An extremely vast
majority of those are found again quickly. With only a few million babies
being born per year in America, a number like 800,000 children per year would
mean 1/4 of the population is vanishing each year. In that case almost every
family would either have a missing child or know several others that do. I'm
sorry if you think I'm shooting the messenger; I'm really just trying to warn
you about characters like Holmseth because I believed him and even donated to
him until I realized he's making up fiction and using a source that uses
clairvoyance to see how many children are supposedly getting raped in
underground military bases....
On Saturday, January 30, 2021, 3:54:38 PM PST, Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just because you don't know or the messenger offended you, it does not change
the facts or truth.Pediphile is wide-Human- Trafficking, Child/Trafficking are
wide-spread truth.Why people can't focus on the research of truth and missing
children 800k per year in America than criticize one who offended him?
Stop shooting the messenger of one video or article and stop being useless
eaters or useful idiots.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 7:09 PM Justin Ross <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't mean to be a conspiracy denier or to be critical of Judge Anna, but
the idea that adrenochrome is a recreational drug comes from the movie Fear &
Loathing in Las Vegas. It is an oxidized form of adrenaline and can be found
in spoiled epi-pens. There is no need to torture children to manufacture
epi-pens so there should be no need for that to make adrenochrome either. I
have yet to see any evidence that people can even get high from taking
adrenochrome anyway.
I don't doubt that people in positions of power use crimes against children for
blackmail, but when people like Holmseth pretend to be part of some "Pentagon
pedophile task force" and put out these red herrings about adrenochrome and "X
number of kids were raped/tortured" in some underground military lab, and I
come to find the source of the allegations is some clairvoyant that does "DNA
reading" or "gene decoding," it just muddies the waters so people have a harder
time finding the truth. It's like when Antifa rioters put on Trump hats and
then the media say Trump supporters caused a riot. It does harm to real
pedophilia victims and whistleblowers and makes it easier for their abusers to
discredit them. I know this is off topic, and Holmseth had me fooled for a
while as well, but I hope people will realize his stuff is made up and stop
spreading it.
On Friday, January 29, 2021, 11:48:49 AM PST, Shining Emperor
<nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2021/01/my-god-my-god.html?m=1 ;
