[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

  • From: "Victor" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "vmswope" for DMARC)
  • To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:10:29 +0000

How do they define the term "infant"? I didnt see a definition.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 29, 2020, 11:36 AM, NELSON DICE wrote:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8#

Thanks for pointing this out

From: [Ray Greninger](mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 11:10 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

1 USC 8 can only apply to the "thing" for if it applied to flesh and blood 
that would be slavery. Doesn't matter though, as the Godly origin of our 
estate begins at fertilization. Everything that happened after that is ours 
also.

On Tuesday, December 29, 2020, 8:41:17 AM MST, NELSON DICE 
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Civil rights under the 14th amendment are for Federal citizens and not State 
Citizens; Federal citizens, as parents, have no right to the custody of their 
infant children except subject to the paramount right of the 
State."Wadleighv. Newhall, Circuit Court N. Dist. Cal., Mar 13, 1905

Sent from 
[Mail](https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ce7f2572def1448b4818b08d8ac143225%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637448550021075230%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=YfTJmFpyXr7U6QJo7kyyapvCaEiYFQVUbEU7d47HedY%3D&reserved=0)
 for Windows 10

Other related posts: