[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

  • From: "Victor" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "vmswope" for DMARC)
  • To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 17:40:22 +0000

You're assuming that infant means the same to them as it does to you. That's 
the game they play, legalese. Re-defining words into customized terms.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 29, 2020, 12:31 PM, NELSON DICE wrote:

the cite says "at any stage of development"

---------------------------------------------------------------

From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of 
Victor <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:22 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

"Infant" has to be defined. It can mean whatever they say it means.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 29, 2020, 12:19 PM, NELSON DICE < nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

what grammar is infant here?

does it modify children??

does infant children denote all who have not declared as a man at or after 
the Age of Majority on the Record.

---------------------------------------------------------------

From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of 
Victor <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:10 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

How do they define the term "infant"? I didnt see a definition.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On Dec 29, 2020, 11:36 AM, NELSON DICE < nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8#](https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.cornell.edu%2Fuscode%2Ftext%2F1%2F8%23&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cb68ac325c92647b585cd08d8ac1e856e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637448594370805519%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=qouRrIR219XvBcQhF2b96h7DRzitmEc8T5LgTXVA1nI%3D&reserved=0)

Thanks for pointing this out

From: [Ray Greninger](mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 11:10 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: 14th amendment citation

1 USC 8 can only apply to the "thing" for if it applied to flesh and blood 
that would be slavery. Doesn't matter though, as the Godly origin of our 
estate begins at fertilization. Everything that happened after that is ours 
also.

On Tuesday, December 29, 2020, 8:41:17 AM MST, NELSON DICE 
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Civil rights under the 14th amendment are for Federal citizens and not 
State Citizens; Federal citizens, as parents, have no right to the custody 
of their infant children except subject to the paramount right of the 
State."Wadleighv. Newhall, Circuit Court N. Dist. Cal., Mar 13, 1905

Sent from 
[Mail](https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cb68ac325c92647b585cd08d8ac1e856e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637448594370815519%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CbVHeGtkJXS1vLeKPUoXr%2BpiruENj0s4o0QNIb3K%2FSY%3D&reserved=0)
 for Windows 10

Other related posts: