[Wittrs] Re: Meaning, Intent and Reference (Parsing Fodor?)

  • From: "gabuddabout" <gabuddabout@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:22:19 -0000

Thanks to Stuart for his warning about Fodor's being hard to read for the 
layman.

Again, another thanks to Stuart for warning about Searle's potential lapses 
without arguing for them.

Of course, if anyone wants, they can propose a problem for Searle (or Fodor for 
that matter) by observing actual writings that seem hard to understand.


Budd

=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. wittrsamr
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2010