[Wittrs] Re: [C] Re: Notes on Duncan Richter's essay 'Did Wittgenstein Disagree With Heidegger?'
- From: John Phillip DeMouy <jpdemouy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:56:31 -0400
Much appreciated. Good knowing that my contributions are not entirely
futile and fruitless.
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 22:35 -0700, kirby urner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:58 PM, John Phillip DeMouy
> <jpdemouy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 609. It is thus perfectly possible that certain psychological
> phenomena
> cannot be investigated physiologically,
> because physiologically nothing corresponds to them.
>
> ... another lovely find. You guys are just geniuses.
>
> Kirby
>
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New
> Topic
> Messages in this topic (9)
> Recent Activity:
> Visit Your Group
> Yahoo! Groups
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
>
> .
>
> __,_._,___
Other related posts:
