> I'm not much of a scripter or a programmer (if you know C++,
> HELP!) but my thought was to have them all pipe to the same
> file, then you only have one file in the end rather than a
> file per computer.
>
> Of course with your way, it would only happen once per
> computer which would probably be easier in the end.
>
> Then you could just make anther script to run against the
> directory to make one big file
>
> Greg
I've done that before, but it seemed that even though I used >> to pipe,
the file would get overwritten when there were many people trying to
write to it at the same time. So, I'd have a list of 100 computers and
two minutes later, there would be 25.
Ray at work
