True. > -----Original Message----- > From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:visurfacereader- > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chip McCain > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:42 AM > To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Future of SurfaceReader > > You could still use an older version of Surface Reader on your laptop, > which the current version should provide fine support for live use > > -----Original Message----- > From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nicole > Massey > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:12 AM > To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Future of SurfaceReader > > Though it will mean I can't use Surface Reader on my laptop, as I can't > upgrade it past XP, which means no Surface Reader in live settings, I > suspect it's probably best to move away from XP support. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:visurfacereader- > > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Doucet > > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:09 AM > > To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Future of SurfaceReader > > > > Personally, I don't see how you can guard against potential problems > > in an os that is not supported. Unfortunately, I vote to drop it. > > > > On 8/12/2014 9:34 AM, Tim Burgess wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > In order to improve the screen-reader handling in SurfaceReader I > > need > > > to decide whether or not to continue to support Windows XP. I've > > > provided this support up to now because a lot of audio users were > > > still using the platform. However, it definitely introduces more > > > work and issues and if Microsoft aren't supporting it in terms of > > > security fixes, etc. I really think it's had its day. > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts and I'll make a decision based on > > feedback. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes. > > > Tim Burgess > > > > > > > > > > >