[uae] Re: Direct or indirect - that is the question (was Re: MacOSX Intel supports JIT?)
- From: Daniel Pimley <uae@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: uae@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:21:36 +0100
On 25 Mar 2007, at 04:35, Richard Drummond wrote:
Indeed. I mentioned some time ago I think these comp_trust#?
options should be
replaced with something simpler. They just confuse people. And as I
said,
they don't - at least, shouldn't - apply in OS X/Intel because
direct memory
access in the JIT isn't supported there yet. I still need to figure
out
what's happening in Anders's case, though.
I've added support for the indirectKS setting since the byte, word
and long options are already configurable in Hi-Toro. The trustnaddr
option will remain unsupported. I like to support as many options as
possible even they are ignored on OS X in case users are making or
viewing configurations intended for other platforms, but in this case
the option is so esoteric I don't think it's worth bothering.
I'll upload a new binary once my webspace comes back to life - it's
been down all weekend :(
Regards,
Daniel Pimley
Other related posts:
