[THIN] Re: latency
- From: "Stratton, Doug MSER:EX" <Doug.M.Stratton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:23:28 -0700
We had a similar problem. I did not work on it but it was something to do
with one of our NIC's had switched to 10meg from 100 or the duplex setting
was off. Something like that.
We had a client who was opening an enormous Excel spreadsheet and it would
cause delays and then go away.
When the nic problem was fixed all was well.
bye
-----Original Message-----
From: rose.ratliffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rose.ratliffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu, October 03, 02 2:17 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: latency
Good point on the bandwidth. I think now that I've a bunch of suggestions
of where the problem might be coming from, I need to go away and try some
things out, check to see if some of the situations described are applicable
or not.
Rose
****************************************************************************
*************
Rosemarie J. Ratliffe E-mail:
rose.ratliffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Manager Information Systems Tel: (780) 482 2626
Alberta Medical Association Fax: (780) 482 5445
Edmonton AB T5N 3Z1
****************************************************************************
**************
Jim Kenzig
<jimkenz@concent To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
ric.net> cc:
Sent by: Subject: [THIN] Re: latency
thin-bounce@free
lists.org
10/03/02 02:58
PM
Please respond
to thin
Yeah but what are your users doing? Copying a PPT presentation across a
network could eat up all of the bandwidth for example. If you have every
tried out a PacketShaper by packeteer you would be amazed how one user can
suck up all your network resources. JK
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of rose.ratliffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 4:43 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: latency
Everything is within the same Lan, workstation to server pings are returning
< 10ms. Our latency issue is certainly worse when the CPU utilization is
above 50%, but there is no memory bottleneck and typically cpu usage runs
below 30%. We have had the latency reported before 8 am when there are less
than 5 users on and high CPU usage is unlikely(not impossible I suppose). I
do keep taskmgr running to monitor the performance throughout the day. We
have disabled the time zone, but not looked at the hotfixes mentioned in
other messages as they relate to Win2K server and we are running on NT. The
array controller issue mentioned is interesting as I am quite certain we are
using the Compaq SmartArray 431 controller. It is something for us to look
at anyway.
**********************************************
This weeks sponsor 99Point9.com
99Point9 helps solve your unresolved technical
server-based questions, issues and incidents. http://www.99point9.com
***********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
**********************************************
This weeks sponsor 99Point9.com
99Point9 helps solve your unresolved technical
server-based questions, issues and incidents. http://www.99point9.com
***********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
**********************************************
This weeks sponsor 99Point9.com
99Point9 helps solve your unresolved technical
server-based questions, issues and incidents.
http://www.99point9.com
***********************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link.
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
