[THIN] Re: Web Interface 2.0
- From: "Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation" <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:32:23 -0400
Yes, I know, it wasn't my decision. I'm sure I'll get the go-ahead the day
after we get nailed...
- Bob Coffman
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:25 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Web Interface 2.0
Even with NFuse Classic, there is Secure Gateway. There is no need to
expose 1494 to the internet. If your entitled to NFuse your also entitled
to use SG. And yes, I can be made to co-exist on a single server so there
really isn't an excuse not to use it.
Joe
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:57 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: Web Interface 2.0
Other related posts:
