[THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Tom Howarth <tom.howarth@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:21:13 +0100
Tim makes good point when he points out uni-processor. the SMP module
places another large overhead into the environment. if you were to
virtualise Citrix boxes I would recommend 2 uni-processor VM's rather
than 1 dual processor VM. however that said if you can go base tin on
the citrix boxed do so.
On 28/10/05, Tim Mangan <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Usually, yes. However it can make sense if you are moving off of some old
> processors – like maybe sub 1Ghz uni-processors. A big consolidation of
> many servers can make sense if they are very lightly loaded. Otherwise it
> is more often than not a bad idea.
>
>
>
> tim
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Bill Beckettare
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:36 AM
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] VMWare
>
>
>
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong here but we have some people here who want to put
> Citrix on some VM slices. I thought this was a bad idea from a performance
> standpoint. Feedback anyone?
>
--
Tom at home
Other related posts:
