[THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: "msemon@xxxxxxx" <msemon@xxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:34:35 -0400
What is more critical is the resource utilization than the type of server.
If your CPU, Memory, Disk, Or I/O utlization is high then it may not be a
good candidate for VMWare. VMWare makes great sense for consolidating those
underutilized servers that are running around 10-15% utilization. For those
servers that are highly utilized it will be a detriment since you have
virtualization overhead also.
Mike
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Bill Beckett bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:35:51 -0400
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] VMWare
Correct me if I'm wrong here but we have some people here who want to put
Citrix on some VM slices. I thought this was a bad idea from a performance
standpoint. Feedback anyone?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc.
Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know.
Know the probable cause, immediately.
Know it all now with this free white paper.
http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC
********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
