[THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Chris Fraser <chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:50:01 -0700
Ya sure but the fact is that ESX does not use the Linux kernel as it's
virtualization engine. ESX != Linux. It uses a modified Linux VM for the
management interface. Simple as that.
If it wasn't for the Apple II or TRS 80 or Commodore 64 or whatever then
none of this would be possible :)
Jeff Pitsch wrote:
If it wasn't for the linux kernel then none of it would be possible.
On 10/28/05, *Chris Fraser* <chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
ESX will always have better performance because the VMkernel (not linux
kernel) has full control to manage all hardware resources and doesn't
have to pass request through an OS layer (like GSX).
Single proc is definitely the way to go on almost all VMs. I'm still
puzzled at the reasoning behind announcing 4-way SMP, esp since it will
benefit maybe %1 of VMs.
Best Practices Using VMware Virtual SMP
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsmp_best_practices.pdf
ESX Server Architecture and Performance Implications
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx2_performance_implications.pdf
ESX Performance Tips and Tricks
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_performance_tips_tricks.pdf
Reference & Planning for Virtualizing Citrix
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_citrix.pdf
Reference and Capacity Planning with Citrix Presentation Server (for ESX
Server 2)
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx2_citrix_planning.pdf
Jeff Pitsch wrote:
> ESX will always have better performance than GSX because ESX is tied
> more closesly to the linux kernel. GSX is strictly a service and
> doesn't tie deeply into the OS at all.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 10/28/05, *Jon D* <rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>
> I run citrix in VMware GSX, and I have an identical physical
citrix
> box. Both production.
>
> I wish I would have put it in ESX with SMP because the citrix box
> can only use 1 processor which isnt good(even with GSX dual
> processor license).
>
> I would say VMWare burns 20-30% of the resources(the physical can
> probably handle 20-30% more connections).
>
> The performance problems I see is the physical disk, and
mainly the
> processor. 1 3Ghz processor is only good for maybe 23-25
processes.
>
> Overall I do like it though. If my manager messes up the virtual
> citrix server I just revert it to the last snapshot and its
fixed.
> If he messes up the physical one, I've got a a solid week of
redoing
> it ahead of me.
>
>
>
> -Jon-
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
--
Check out my eBay auctions
(http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZchrisfraser1111QQhtZ-1)
and my GEMM store ( http://cfraser1111.gemm.com)
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc.
Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know.
Know the probable cause, immediately.
Know it all now with this free white paper.
http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC
********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
--
Check out my eBay auctions
(http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZchrisfraser1111QQhtZ-1)
and my GEMM store (http://cfraser1111.gemm.com)
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc.
Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know.
Know the probable cause, immediately.
Know it all now with this free white paper.
http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC
********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- References:
- [THIN] VMWare
- From: Bill Beckett
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Tim Mangan
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Tom Howarth
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jon D
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Chris Fraser
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
- » [THIN] Re: VMWare
If it wasn't for the linux kernel then none of it would be possible.
On 10/28/05, *Chris Fraser* <chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:chrisfraser@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
ESX will always have better performance because the VMkernel (not linux
kernel) has full control to manage all hardware resources and doesn't
have to pass request through an OS layer (like GSX). Single proc is definitely the way to go on almost all VMs. I'm still
puzzled at the reasoning behind announcing 4-way SMP, esp since it will
benefit maybe %1 of VMs. Best Practices Using VMware Virtual SMP
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsmp_best_practices.pdf ESX Server Architecture and Performance Implications
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx2_performance_implications.pdf ESX Performance Tips and Tricks
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_performance_tips_tricks.pdf Reference & Planning for Virtualizing Citrix
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx_citrix.pdf Reference and Capacity Planning with Citrix Presentation Server (for ESX
Server 2)
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx2_citrix_planning.pdf Jeff Pitsch wrote:
> ESX will always have better performance than GSX because ESX is tied
> more closesly to the linux kernel. GSX is strictly a service and
> doesn't tie deeply into the OS at all.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On 10/28/05, *Jon D* <rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>
> I run citrix in VMware GSX, and I have an identical physical
citrix
> box. Both production.
>
> I wish I would have put it in ESX with SMP because the citrix box
> can only use 1 processor which isnt good(even with GSX dual
> processor license).
>
> I would say VMWare burns 20-30% of the resources(the physical can
> probably handle 20-30% more connections).
>
> The performance problems I see is the physical disk, and
mainly the
> processor. 1 3Ghz processor is only good for maybe 23-25
processes.
>
> Overall I do like it though. If my manager messes up the virtual
> citrix server I just revert it to the last snapshot and its
fixed.
> If he messes up the physical one, I've got a a solid week of
redoing
> it ahead of me.
>
>
>
> -Jon-
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>--
Check out my eBay auctions
(http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZchrisfraser1111QQhtZ-1)
and my GEMM store ( http://cfraser1111.gemm.com)
******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: Cesura, Inc. Know about Citrix end-user slowdowns before they know. Know the probable cause, immediately. Know it all now with this free white paper. http://www.cesurasolutions.com/landing/WPBCForCitrix.htm?mc=WETBCC ******************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities! http://www.thinwiki.com *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
--
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- [THIN] VMWare
- From: Bill Beckett
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Tim Mangan
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Tom Howarth
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jon D
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Chris Fraser
- [THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch