[THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
- From: Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:08:22 -0600
you can get an Access Gateway virtual appliance for less than $1000. You
get mobile app ability which is for blackberry and droid too. Plus easy as
pie encryption for your fat clients. It's not such a bad deal.
If a company can afford to deploy citrx, but can't afford the extra
$700-$1000 for the Access Gateway, they've got bigger problems.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *I guess but companies in this economy really do not have the dollars to
> buy a box/licenses just so their people can use an iPad. It certainly
> doesn't make any economic sense to me.
> **Jim Kenzig
> http://www.kenzig.com*
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That sounds like exactly what Jo Harder keeps saying!
>>
>>
>> Webster
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> > Behalf Of Joe Shonk
>> > Subject: [THIN] Re: Receiver 4.2.1
>> >
>> > Question I have is, if the iPad is becoming critical at the customer
>> site
>> why
>> > wouldn't they want to invest in AG? For one, it's a supported
>> configuration
>> > and second if remote access becomes critical the access solution can
>> easily
>> > be made HA.
>> >
>> > Don't get me wrong, CSG is great simple/small solutions but when they
>> > outgrow it's time to upgrade.
>> >
>> > Joe
>>
>> ************************************************
>> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
>> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
>> //www.freelists.org/list/thin
>> Follow ThinList on Twitter
>> http://twitter.com/thinlist
>> ************************************************
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
