[THIN] Re: Profiles
- From: Jason Miller <JMiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:49:38 -0400
I'll say this: I've had no issues w/ roaming profiles in Citrix. I'm
running Metaframe XP FR1 (soon to be FR3) on Win2K Servers and haven't had
any issues. At first I had alot of issues, but after some research I found
two MS Hotfixes that tend to break roaming profiles. They're #'s 328310
and 329170. With a little tweaking it can be pretty sweet.
Now, If I mis-read your question and they're going to stick w/ NT4 desktops
and want to use the same roaming profile between the NT4 desktop and the
Win2k Citrix servers....then I haven't heard of anyone doing that. Seems
like there would be some obvious conflicts.
Hope this helps.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Watts [mailto:greg.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:29 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Profiles
I have a customer who is still on MF 1.8 on NT 4 TSE and he is using the
same roaming profile for both his NT 4 desktops and his Published Desktop
via Citrix. They are now migrating to Windows 2000 , Metaframe XP FR3 and AD
and they are planning to do the same thing in this environment. I did not
recommend them even attempting this for obvious reasons. I was wondoring if
any one is doing this and what your experiences was were.. I was wondoring
if I should just come out and tell him that this is probably going to be a
big challenge for him. Microsoft best practices states that a TS specific
profile is recommended but not disallowed. Can anyone point me to some
documentation other than Microsoft that states this as a "Best Practice".
Thanks,
Greg Watts
Other related posts:
