I did tests when HI-FI first came out. It really made no difference at all if the tape was recorded in SP or EP for sound quality. Dynamic range was greater than 80 db and un-weighted wow and flutter was under .008%. There was no measurable difference between SP or EP. The HI-FI tape to head velocity is still 5.8 meters per second. The only measurable problem I've seen on these machines is tangential switching noise from time to time. This is caused by a gap between the RF envelopes between HI-FI head "A" & HIFI head "B". Usually on machines that are worn. Don't sell VHS HI-FI short. It is very close to CD quality. Dennis Ledstiles@xxxxxxx wrote: > In a message dated 11/25/2001 11:44:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, > jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > << > > there....the hi-fi audio quality is actually better in most > > cases @ EP (slowest speed) because due to the rotation of the > > head drum, it is the same direction of the tape path; so if > > you slow that down to EP, the tape of course then is going > > slower therefore the 'writing speed' is increased. It is > > usually not noticeable to ears since the audio specs are so > > good to begin with, but it does show on paper. Usually ab >> > I don't buy it. audio quaility is always better in sp speed vers ep speed. > Larry > N.C.S. > ================================= > Help make your TechAssist database better! > Submit your fixes here: http://circuitwork.com/techassist/tip/#tips > ================================= > To UNSUBSCRIBE your email address, click here: > mailto:techassist-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe ================================= Help make your TechAssist database better! Submit your fixes here: http://circuitwork.com/techassist/tip/#tips ================================= To UNSUBSCRIBE your email address, click here: mailto:techassist-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe